Literature DB >> 7844208

A comparison between a standard and reduced dose of D-Trp-6-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone administered after pituitary suppression for in-vitro fertilization.

A Simon1, A Benshushan, A Shushan, G Zajicek, D Dorembus, A Lewin, N Laufer.   

Abstract

A randomized prospective study was undertaken to compare low and standard luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa) dosage used in combination with gonadotrophins in ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). A total of 42 ovulatory patients with mechanical infertility were administered 0.5 mg/day LHRHa (Decapeptyl) from day 21 of their cycles for 14 days. Following down-regulation, patients were randomly allocated to continue with the same dose of LHRHa (22 patients, group A) or to receive a lower dose of 0.1 mg/day LHRHa (20 patients, group B) during folliculogenesis. Luteal phase was supported by daily i.m. progesterone (50 mg) injections and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; 1500 IU) every 4 days. Ovarian response, human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) dosage used for induction of ovulation, evidence of premature luteinization, and clinical and laboratory IVF outcome, were compared between groups A and B. The two groups were comparable in respect of: age (32.6 +/- 0.7 and 33.0 +/- 0.9 years), HMG dosage (33.0 +/- 1.6 and 36.0 +/- 2.5 ampoules), day of HCG (11.2 +/- 0.3 and 12.2 +/- 0.4), oocytes/patient (13.3 +/- 1.0 and 12.9 +/- 1.3), fertilization rate (68.5 and 65.2%), cleavage rate (95% for both), pregnancy/embryo transfer (32 and 35%) and implantation rate (10.8 and 10.5%), for groups A and B respectively. There was no evidence of premature luteinization or luteolysis in either group. It was concluded that lowering the dose of LHRHa to 0.1 mg/day during folliculogenesis had no adverse effect on ovarian response or clinical results. However, it had no advantage in reducing the HMG dose used for ovulation induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7844208     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  3 in total

1.  Improvement of IVF outcome in poor responders by discontinuation of GnRH analogue during the gonadotropin stimulation phase--a function of improved embryo quality.

Authors:  M Schachter; S Friedler; A Raziel; D Strassburger; O Bern; R Ron-el
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Comparison of cryopreservation outcome following intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  A Simon; H Holzer; A Hurwitz; A Revel; B S Zentner; F Lossos; N Laufer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Contemporary pharmacological manipulation in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Judith A F Huirne; Cornelis B Lambalk; Andre C D van Loenen; Roel Schats; Peter G A Hompes; Bart C J M Fauser; Nick S Macklon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.