Literature DB >> 9710392

Intraoperative determination of cardiac output using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: a comparison to thermodilution.

A C Perrino1, S N Harris, M A Luther.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limitations in the imaging views that can be obtained with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) have hindered development of a widely adopted Doppler method for cardiac output (CO) monitoring. The authors evaluated a CO technique that combines steerable continuous-wave Doppler with the imaging capabilities of two-dimensional multiplane TEE.
METHODS: From the transverse plane transgastric, short-axis view of the left ventricle, the imaging array was rotated to view the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and ascending aorta. Steerable continuous-wave Doppler was subsequently used to measure aortic blood flow velocities. Aortic valve area was determined using a triangular orifice model. Matched thermodilution and Doppler CO measurements were obtained serially during surgery.
RESULTS: The left ventricular outflow tract was imaged in 32 of 33 patients (97%). Data analysis reveal a mean difference between techniques of -0.01 l/min, and a standard deviation of the differences of 0.56 l/min. Multiple regression showed a correlation of r = 0.98 between intrasubject changes in CO. Multiplane TEE correctly tracked the direction of 37 of 38 serial changes in thermodilution CO but with a modest 14% underestimation of the magnitude of these changes.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that multiplane TEE can provide an alternative method for the intraoperative measurement of CO. The ability of the rotatable imaging array to align with the left ventricular outflow tract and the need for only minimal adjustments in probe position advance the utility of intraoperative TEE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9710392     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199808000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  26 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac output monitoring devices: an analytic review.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Ali El-Solh; Peter Papadakos; Nader Djalal Nader
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Continuous minimally invasive peri-operative monitoring of cardiac output by pulmonary capnotracking: comparison with thermodilution and transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Philip J Peyton
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Assessment of changes in blood glucose concentration with intravascular microdialysis.

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Fischer; Corentin Gouëzel; Sabine Fradin; Vladimir Saplacan; Jean-Louis Gérard; Jean-Luc Fellahi; Jean-Luc Hanouz
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  The Diagnosis and Hemodynamic Monitoring of Circulatory Shock: Current and Future Trends.

Authors:  Adham Hendy; Şerban-Ion Bubenek-Turconi
Journal:  J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures)       Date:  2016-08-10

Review 5.  Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring.

Authors:  Yatin Mehta; Dheeraj Arora
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-26

6.  Ability of the Masimo pulse CO-Oximeter to detect changes in hemoglobin.

Authors:  Douglas A Colquhoun; Katherine T Forkin; Marcel E Durieux; Robert H Thiele
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  A comparison of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the oesophageal Doppler monitor during major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Luke E Hodgson; Lui G Forni; Richard Venn; Theophilus L Samuels; Howard G Wakeling
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-10-14

8.  Performance of a second generation pulmonary capnotracking system for continuous monitoring of cardiac output.

Authors:  Philip J Peyton; Monique Kozub
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 9.  [Assessment of volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients].

Authors:  D A Reuter; A E Goetz; K Peter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 10.  Systematic review of cardiac output measurements by echocardiography vs. thermodilution: the techniques are not interchangeable.

Authors:  Mik Wetterslev; Hasse Møller-Sørensen; Rasmus Rothmann Johansen; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.