Literature DB >> 9709272

The Edinburgh Randomized Trial of Breast Cancer Screening.

F E Alexander1.   

Abstract

This article presents additional follow-up analysis of women aged 45-49 from the Edinburgh Randomized Trial of Breast Cancer Screening. The screening protocol included four mammographic examinations at two-year intervals and seven annual clinical examinations. Altogether, 21,774 women aged 45-49 were recruited from 1978 to 1985 using cluster randomization. After 10-14 years of follow-up, breast cancer mortality has been reduced by 12% to 18% (rate ratios, with and without adjustment for socio-economic status, are 0.88 and 0.82 respectively, with 95% confidence intervals [CIs] of 0.55-1.41 and 0.51-1.32). These benefits are smaller than that reported previously with shorter follow-up. This article also presents data from an observational study that compared survival beyond baseline (50-52 years) of women first offered screening before and after age 50. Based on six-year data, the results suggest that earlier screening confers follow-up benefit (hazard ratio for later screening = 1.60; 95% CI: 0.96-2.67), but these findings are not statistically significant. The trial is too small to yield statistically significant results by itself, but can make useful contributions to overview and meta-analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9709272     DOI: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  7 in total

1.  CJS debate: Is mammography useful in average-risk screening for breast cancer?

Authors:  Muriel Brackstone; Steven Latosinsky; Elizabeth Saettler; Ralph George
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Bahcesehir long-term population-based screening compared to National Breast Cancer Registry Data: effectiveness of screening in an emerging country.

Authors:  Sibel Ozkan Gurdal; Ayse Nilufer Ozaydın; Erkin Aribal; Beyza Ozcinar; Neslihan Cabioglu; Cennet Sahin; Vahit Ozmen
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 3.  Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Authors:  Meteb Al-Foheidi; Mubarak M Al-Mansour; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-01-01

5.  Contribution of clinical breast exam to cancer detection in women participating in a modern screening program.

Authors:  Tehillah S Menes; Dan Coster; Daniel Coster; Shani Shenhar-Tsarfaty
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 6.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04

7.  Rational and irrational issues in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Cornelia J Baines
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.