Literature DB >> 9699218

NCCN urothelial cancer practice guidelines. National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

H Scher1, R Bahnson, S Cohen, M Eisenberger, H Herr, J Kozlowski, P Lange, J Montie, A Pollack, D Raghaven, J Richie, W Shipley.   

Abstract

Urothelial tumors represent a spectrum of diseases with a range of prognoses. Once a diagnosis is established at any point on the urothelial tract, the patient remains at risk for developing a new lesion at a different or the same location, at a similar or more advanced stage. Continued monitoring for recurrence is an essential part of management, as most recurrences are superficial and can be managed by endoscopic means. Within each category of disease, more refined methods to determine prognosis and guide management, based on molecular staging, are under development. These methods are aimed at optimizing the individual patient's likelihood of cure and chance for organ preservation. For patients with more extensive disease, newer treatments typically involve combined-modality approaches using recently developed surgical procedures, or three-dimensional treatment planning for more precise delivery of radiation therapy. While these are not appropriate in all cases, they do offer the promise of an improved quality of life and prolonged survival. Finally, within the category of metastatic disease, a number of new agents have been identified that appear to be superior to those currently considered to be standard therapies. It is thought, therefore, that the treatment of urothelial tumors will evolve rapidly over the next few years, with improved outcomes for patients with all stages of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9699218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)        ISSN: 0890-9091            Impact factor:   2.990


  17 in total

1.  Chronological age is not an independent predictor of clinical outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Thomas F Chromecki; Behfar Ehdaie; Giacomo Novara; Karl Pummer; Richard Zigeuner; Christian Seitz; Armin Pycha; Richard K Lee; Eugene K Cha; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Casey Ng; Jay D Raman; Felix K Chun; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Wassim Kassouf; Thomas J Walton; Patrick J Bastian; Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Douglas S Scherr; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas F Chromecki; Karim Bensalah; Mesut Remzi; Grégory Verhoest; Eugene K Cha; Douglas S Scherr; Giacomo Novara; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Multicenter evaluation of the role of UroVysion FISH assay in surveillance of patients with bladder cancer: does FISH positivity anticipate recurrence?

Authors:  Casey Seideman; Daniel Canter; Philip Kim; Billy Cordon; Alon Weizer; Irma Oliva; Jianyu Rao; Brant A Inman; Michael Posch; Harry Herr; Yair Lotan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Use of radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  John L Gore; Mark S Litwin; Julie Lai; Elizabeth M Yano; Rodger Madison; Claude Setodji; John L Adams; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Renal function and oncologic outcomes of parenchymal sparing ureteral resection versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan L Silberstein; Nicholas E Power; Caroline Savage; Tatum V Tarin; Ricardo L Favaretto; Daniel Su; Matthew G Kaag; Harry W Herr; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Regional differences in practice patterns and associated outcomes for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Canada.

Authors:  Michael Metcalfe; Wassim Kassouf; Ricardo Rendon; David Bell; Jonathan Izawa; Joseph Chin; Anil Kapoor; Edward Matsumoto; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Fred Saad; Louis Lacombe; Yves Fradet; Adrian Fairey; Niels-Eric Jacobson; Darryl Drachenberg; Ilias Cagiannos; Alan So; Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Comparative survival following different treatment modalities for stage T2 bladder cancer in octogenarians.

Authors:  Jerry J Trulson; Pranav Sharma; Tyler Haden; Emil Kheterpal; Naveen Pokala
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Patterns of care for early stage bladder cancer.

Authors:  Seth A Strope; Zaojun Ye; John M Hollingsworth; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Predictors of intravesical therapy for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: results from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program 2003 patterns of care project.

Authors:  George J Huang; Ann S Hamilton; Mary Lo; John P Stein; David F Penson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Treatment of locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  Makarand V Khochikar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.