Literature DB >> 23282664

Regional differences in practice patterns and associated outcomes for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Canada.

Michael Metcalfe1, Wassim Kassouf, Ricardo Rendon, David Bell, Jonathan Izawa, Joseph Chin, Anil Kapoor, Edward Matsumoto, Jean-Baptiste Lattouf, Fred Saad, Louis Lacombe, Yves Fradet, Adrian Fairey, Niels-Eric Jacobson, Darryl Drachenberg, Ilias Cagiannos, Alan So, Peter Black.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: : We delineated Canadian regional differences in practice patterns in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after nephroureterectomy and relate these to patient outcomes.
METHODS: : A database was created with 1029 patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for UTUC between 1994 and 2009 at 10 Canadian centres. Demographic, clinical and pathological variables were collected from chart review. Practice pattern variables were defined as: open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, management strategy for the distal ureter, performance of lymphadenectomy and administration of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. The outcome measures were overall (OS), disease-specific (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The centres were divided into three regions (West, Central, East). Cox proportional multivariable linear regression analysis was used to determine the association between regional differences in practice patterns and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: : There was a significant difference in practice patterns between regions within Canada for: time from diagnosis to surgery (p = 0.001), type of surgery (open vs. laparoscopic, p < 0.01) and method of management of the distal ureter (p = 0.001). As well, there were significant differences in survival between regions across Canada: 5-year OS (West 70%, Central 81% and East 62%, p < 0.0001) and DSS (West=79%, Central=85%, East=75%, p = 0.007) were significantly different, but there was no difference in RFS (West 47%, Central 48%, East 46%, p = 0.88). Multivariable linear regression analysis demonstrated that the differences in survival were independent of region OS (p = 0.78), DSS (p = 0.30) or RFS (p = 0.43).
CONCLUSION: : There is significant disparity in practice patterns between regions within Canada, but these do not appear to have an effect on survival. We believe that the variability in practice is a reflection of the lack of standardized treatments for UTUC and underlines the need for multi-institutional studies in this disease.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23282664      PMCID: PMC3526631          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.12146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  17 in total

1.  Oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy: results from an international cohort.

Authors:  Thomas J Walton; Giacomo Novara; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Wassim Kassouf; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Walter Artibani; Patrick J Bastian; Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Christian Seitz; Stephen A Thomas; Vincenzo Ficarra; Maximilian Burger; Stefan Tritschler; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Does prolonging the time to bladder cancer surgery affect long-term cancer control: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Yves Fradet; Armen Aprikian; George Dranitsaris; Robert Siemens; John Tsihlias; Neil Fleshner
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.344

3.  Assessment of oncologic control obtained after open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UCs): results from a large French multicenter collaborative study.

Authors:  Mehdi Mokhtar Ariane; Pierre Colin; Adil Ouzzane; Geraldine Pignot; Marie Audouin; Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Baptiste Albouy; Julien Guillotreau; Yann Neuzillet; Sébastien Crouzet; Sophie Hurel; Frederic Arroua; Pierre Bigot; Charles Marchand; Pierre Olivier Fais; Alexandre de la Taille; Fabien Saint; Emmanuel Ravier; Alexandre Matte; Laurent Guy; Franck Bruyère; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  [European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas: 2011 update. European Association of Urology Guideline Group for urothelial cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract].

Authors:  M Rouprêt; R Zigeuner; J Palou; A Boehle; E Kaasinen; R Sylvester; M Babjuk; W Oosterlinck
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 0.994

5.  Comparison of oncological outcomes for open and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy: results from the Canadian Upper Tract Collaboration.

Authors:  Adrian S Fairey; Wassim Kassouf; Eric Estey; Simon Tanguay; Ricardo Rendon; David Bell; Jonathan Izawa; Joseph Chin; Anil Kapoor; Edward Matsumoto; Peter Black; Alan So; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Fred Saad; Darrel Drachenberg; Ilias Cagiannos; Louis Lacombe; Yves Fradet; Niels-Erik B Jacobsen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: impact of time to surgery.

Authors:  Debasish Sundi; Robert S Svatek; Vitaly Margulis; Christopher G Wood; Surena F Matin; Colin P Dinney; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  NCCN urothelial cancer practice guidelines. National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Authors:  H Scher; R Bahnson; S Cohen; M Eisenberger; H Herr; J Kozlowski; P Lange; J Montie; A Pollack; D Raghaven; J Richie; W Shipley
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.990

8.  Longer wait times increase overall mortality in patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni; David R Urbach; Peter C Austin; Neil E Fleshner; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Comparison of oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1249 cases.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Shahrokh F Shariat; Hendrik Isbarn; Alon Weizer; Mesut Remzi; Marco Roscigno; Eiji Kikuchi; Jay D Raman; Christian Bolenz; Karim Bensalah; Theresa M Koppie; Wassim Kassouf; Mario I Fernández; Philipp Ströbel; Jeffrey Wheat; Richard Zigeuner; Cord Langner; Matthias Waldert; Mototsugu Oya; Charles C Guo; Casey Ng; Francesco Montorsi; Christopher G Wood; Vitaly Margulis; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  The oncological results of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell cancer are equal to those of open nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Matthias Waldert; Mesut Remzi; Hans Christoph Klingler; Lukas Mueller; Michael Marberger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  5 in total

1.  Mining the data on UTUC management.

Authors:  Michael J Leveridge
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Can lymphovascular invasion replace the prognostic value of lymph node involvement in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy?

Authors:  Eun Sang Yoo; Yun-Sok Ha; Jun Nyung Lee; Bum Soo Kim; Bup Wan Kim; Seok-Soo Byun; Young Deuk Choi; Ho Won Kang; Seok-Joong Yun; Wun-Jae Kim; Jeong Hyun Kim; Tae Gyun Kwon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Current Status of Lymphadenectomy During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer-Yes, No or Maybe?

Authors:  Ashwin Sunil Tamhankar; Saurabh Ramesh Patil; Puneet Ahluwalia; Gagan Gautam
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-13

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Wei Guo; Xueying Zhou; Youpeng Ding; Yanan Ma; Yi Hou; Xiangbo Kong; Zhixin Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Su Zhang; You Luo; Cheng Wang; Sheng-Jun Fu; Li Yang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.