Literature DB >> 23817891

Comparative survival following different treatment modalities for stage T2 bladder cancer in octogenarians.

Jerry J Trulson1, Pranav Sharma, Tyler Haden, Emil Kheterpal, Naveen Pokala.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A higher rate of comorbidities and an anticipated higher operative risk in octogenarians may influence urologists in opting for less aggressive and less effective treatment modalities for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. This study was performed to compare survival after different treatment modalities in octogenarians with stage T2 bladder cancer.
METHODS: Patients that were 80 years or older with a diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-17 registry database between 1988 and 2007. Patients were analyzed for treatment method and outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).
RESULTS: A total of 3,232 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 69 % (N = 2,216) underwent only transurethral resection (TURBT), 23 % (N = 733) underwent pelvic radiation therapy (RT), and 9 % (N = 283) underwent definitive surgical therapy. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS rates were 22.2, 15.0, and 4.4 %, respectively, for TURBT; 27.8, 18.3, and 3.5 % for RT; and 52.7, 39.1, and 17.2 % for definitive surgery. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year CSS rates were 38.3, 33.4, and 27.4 %, respectively, for TURBT; 41.6, 35.0, and 27.2 % for RT; and 66.6, 55.5, and 49.9 % for definitive surgery. Both partial and radical cystectomy had significantly longer CSS rates at 3 and 5 years when compared to RT (p ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other treatment modalities, surgery, either radical cystectomy or partial cystectomy, offers the best OS and CSS for men aged 80 years or older with T2 bladder cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23817891     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-013-1123-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  21 in total

1.  Radical cystectomy is safe in elderly patients at high risk.

Authors:  S S Chang; G Alberts; M S Cookson; J A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Defining optimal therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Harry W Herr; Zohar Dotan; S Machele Donat; Dean F Bajorin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Associations between comorbidity, and overall survival and bladder cancer specific survival after radical cystectomy: results from the Alberta Urology Institute Radical Cystectomy database.

Authors:  Adrian S Fairey; Niels-Erik B Jacobsen; Michael P Chetner; David R Mador; James B Metcalfe; Ronald B Moore; Keith F Rourke; Gerald T Todd; Peter M Venner; Don C Voaklander; Eric P Estey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Benefit of radical cystectomy in the elderly patient with significant co-morbidities.

Authors:  Scott B Farnham; Michael S Cookson; Gregory Alberts; Joseph A Smith; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 5.  Surgical management of infiltrating bladder cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Michaël Peyromaure; Florent Guerin; Bernard Debre; Marc Zerbib
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Brachytherapy versus cystectomy in solitary bladder cancer: a case control, multicentre, East-Netherlands study.

Authors:  Elzbieta van der Steen-Banasik; Martine Ploeg; Johannes A Witjes; Farida S van Rey; Jan G Idema; Robert P Heijbroek; Herbert F Karthaus; Janny G Reinders; A Viddeleer; Andries G Visser
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  NCCN urothelial cancer practice guidelines. National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Authors:  H Scher; R Bahnson; S Cohen; M Eisenberger; H Herr; J Kozlowski; P Lange; J Montie; A Pollack; D Raghaven; J Richie; W Shipley
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.990

8.  [Is radical cystectomy justified in patients over 75 years old?].

Authors:  Collado A Serra; Solsona E Narbón; Rubio J Briones; Casanova J Ramón-Borja; Iborra I Juan; Ricós J V Torrent
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.994

9.  [Partial cystectomy: and alternative to radical cystectomy? Apropos of a series of 75 patients].

Authors:  D Demetriou; B Mauroy; P Danjou; J Biserte; E Mazeman
Journal:  Acta Urol Belg       Date:  1992

10.  Radical cystectomy over the age of 75 is safe and increases survival.

Authors:  Stavros I Tyritzis; Ioannis Anastasiou; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Aristeides Alevizopoulos; Anastasios Kollias; Antonios Balangas; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Ioannis Leotsakos; Dionysios Mitropoulos; Constantinos A Constantinides
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.921

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of preoperative hemoglobin and CRP levels on cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: results of a single-center study.

Authors:  T Grimm; A Buchner; B Schneevoigt; A Kretschmer; M Apfelbeck; M Grabbert; J F Jokisch; C G Stief; A Karl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Performance of partial cystectomy in the United States from 2001 to 2010: trends and comparative outcomes.

Authors:  Izak Faiena; Viktor Dombrovskiy; Christopher Koprowski; Eric A Singer; Thomas L Jang; Robert E Weiss
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.344

3.  Detubularised isolated ureterosigmoidostomy (Atta pouch): Manometric and radiological studies in a sample of patients.

Authors:  Mohamed A Atta; Tamer A Youssif; Tamer A Youssef; Gerges F Boules; Ahmed F Kotb
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2014-03-24

4.  Mortality Trends Related to Bladder Cancer in Spain, 1999-2018.

Authors:  Pau Sarrio-Sanz; Laura Martinez-Cayuelas; Vicente Francisco Gil-Guillen; José Antonio Quesada; Luis Gomez-Perez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.