Literature DB >> 12084306

Current status of penile prosthesis implantation.

D K Montague1, K W Angermeier.   

Abstract

Today most men with erectile dysfunction (ED) can be effectively treated with less invasive means than penile prosthesis implantation. Nevertheless, there remain men who do not respond to simple treatments such as systemic medication and who either do not respond to or reject intermediate treatment such as penile injection therapy. For these men, penile prosthesis implantation remains a reasonable option. This review discusses types of penile prostheses, how to choose among prosthesis types, key features of implant techniques, infection management, penile reconstruction related to prosthesis implantation, and patient and partner satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 12084306     DOI： 10.1007/s11934-000-0009-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN： 1527-2737            Impact factor:   2.862


  54 in total

1.  Early experience with the controlled girth and length expanding cylinder of the American Medical Systems Ultrex penile prosthesis.

Authors:  D K Montague; M M Lakin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Cavernous tissue antibiotic levels in penile prosthesis surgery.

Authors:  F P Walters; D E Neal; A B Rege; W J George; M J Ricci; W J Hellstrom
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Patient and partner satisfaction with the AMS 700 penile prosthesis.

Authors:  R H McLaren; D M Barrett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Long-term experience with salvage of infected penile implants.

Authors:  J J Mulcahy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Ultrex cylinders: problems with uncontrolled lengthening (the S-shaped deformity).

Authors:  S K Wilson; M A Cleves; J R Delk
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Cultures from genitourinary prostheses at reoperation: questioning the role of Staphylococcus epidermidis in periprosthetic infection.

Authors:  M R Licht; D K Montague; K W Angermeier; M M Lakin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  "Finger trap" penile lengthening after partial penectomy by multiple incisions in the tunica albuginea.

Authors:  R A Santucci; R E Berger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The AMS 700 inflatable penile prosthesis: long-term experience with the controlled expansion cylinders.

Authors:  E T Quesada; J K Light
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Initial experience with processed human cadaveric allograft skin for reconstruction of the corpus cavernosum in repair of distal extrusion of a penile prosthesis.

Authors:  J Landman; N Bar-Chama
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  A new treatment for Peyronie's disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis.

Authors:  S K Wilson; J R Delk
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.450
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Erectile dysfunction following radical retropubic prostatectomy: epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacological management.

Authors:  Kalyana C Nandipati; Rupesh Raina; Ashok Agarwal; Craig D Zippe
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Three-piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Surgical Techniques and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Ahmad Al-Enezi; Sulaiman Al-Khadhari; Tariq F Al-Shaiji
Journal:  J Surg Tech Case Rep       Date:  2011-07

Review 3.  Post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction: contemporary approaches from a US perspective.

Authors:  Zachary Hamilton; Moben Mirza
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2014-05-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.