Literature DB >> 9692081

Femoral neck axis length, height loss and risk of hip fracture in males and females.

J R Center1, T V Nguyen, N A Pocock, K A Noakes, P J Kelly, J A Eisman, P N Sambrook.   

Abstract

Hip axis length (HAL) has been proposed as an independent predictor of hip fracture risk in Caucasian females. Femoral neck axis length (FNAL) is a similar measure of femoral geometry but does not include acetabular structures. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hip geometry, using FNAL, and hip fractures in elderly males and females in relation to other anthropometric data. The study group comprised 123 females (23 hip fracture patients and 100 age-matched controls) and 137 males (13 hip fracture patients, 65 age-matched controls and 59 current-height-matched controls). All subjects had femoral neck bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. From these scans, FNAL was measured as the linear distance from the base of the greater trochanter to the apex of the femoral head. FNAL was correlated significantly with current height (r = 0.47 and r = 0.56 for females and males respectively; p < 0.0001) and peak height (r = 0.45 and r = 0.57 for females and males respectively; p < 0.0001) in both sexes. In females, FNAL in the fracture patients (91.5 +/- 5.4 mm, mean +/- SD) was not significantly different from FNAL in controls (89.7 +/- 5.4 mm; p = 0.2). Fracture patients had the same current height as controls and a trend towards a greater peak height (163 +/- 6 cm vs 160 +/- cm; p = 0.09). After adjusting FNAL for current or peak height there was no difference in FNAL between fracture patients and controls. In males, FNAL in the fracture patients (103.9 +/- 3.9 mm) was not significantly different from that of age-matched controls (103.4 +/- 6.3 mm; p = 0.79). Fracture patients had a significantly lower current height (168 +/- 6 cm) than the age-matched controls (174 +/- 6 cm; p = 0.0008) but had the same peak height. When adjusted for peak height there were no significant differences between height of hip fracture patients (102.0 +/- 4.9 cm), age-matched controls (102.1 +/- 5.1 cm) and current-height-matched controls (102.6 +/- 5.3 cm). Fracture patients had a significantly greater height loss (peak height minus current height) than either control group. In logistic regression analyses peak height in females and height loss in males but not FNAL were independent predictors of hip fracture. The greater height, FNAL and presumably HAL in males versus females is not associated with increased hip fracture risk. However, in this study of elderly males and females, peak height (females) and height loss (males) were independent risk factors for hip fracture. Moreover, FNAL appears to have limited utility in the prediction of hip fracture risk and any role of HAL in the prediction of hip fracture does not relate to its major component of femoral neck length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9692081     DOI: 10.1007/s001980050051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  26 in total

1.  Risk factors for 5-year prospective height loss among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Xiaodan Mai; Britt Marshall; Kathleen M Hovey; Jill Sperrazza; Jean Wactawski-Wende
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Potential of P40 plastination for morphometric hip measurements.

Authors:  B Genser-Strobl; M C Sora
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Bivariate linkage study of proximal hip geometry and body size indices: the Framingham study.

Authors:  D Karasik; J Dupuis; L A Cupples; T J Beck; M C Mahaney; L M Havill; D P Kiel; S Demissie
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Development of a parametric finite element model of the proximal femur using statistical shape and density modelling.

Authors:  Daniel P Nicolella; Todd L Bredbenner
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  Femoral neck geometry and hip fracture risk: the Geelong osteoporosis study.

Authors:  S El-Kaissi; J A Pasco; M J Henry; S Panahi; J G Nicholson; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Hip fracture types in men and women change differently with age.

Authors:  David A Tanner; Marita Kloseck; Richard G Crilly; Bert Chesworth; Jason Gilliland
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  Effects of height loss on morbidity and mortality in 3145 community-dwelling Chinese older women and men: a 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Tung Wai Auyeung; Jenny Shun Wah Lee; Jason Leung; Timothy Kwok; Ping Chung Leung; Jean Woo
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 8.  On challenges in clinical assessment of hip fracture risk using image-based biomechanical modelling: a critical review.

Authors:  Yunhua Luo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Influence of acetabular and femoral version on fractures of the femoral neck.

Authors:  A Frost; G Pavlou; P J Richards; J Belcher; V Jasani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; T Jämsä; E-M Lochmüller; V Kuhn; M T Nieminen; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.