Literature DB >> 9691877

Clinical assessment of the single use laryngeal mask airway--the LMA-unique.

C Verghese1, J Berlet, A Kapila, R Pollard.   

Abstract

We conducted a clinical comparison of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and the new single use PVC LMA (LMA-Unique) in 100 fasted adult patients undergoing elective surgery. Patients were allocated to one of two groups: group 1 (n = 50) was managed by two consultants and group 2 by two trainee anaesthetists. Airway management was randomized prospectively within each group, and cuff pressure in both devices was maintained at a maximum of 50 mm Hg with upward size substitution if leaks persisted during intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV). Insertion with the recommended technique was successful in all patients (85 first attempt). One patient (group 1) required four attempts for insertion of the LMA-Unique and in one patient (group 2) the LMA-Unique was replaced by a tracheal tube because of persistent leaks during IPPV. In 99 patients IPPV was uneventful. The adjusted mean volume of air for cuff inflation in the LMA-Unique was significantly less in group 1 (P = 0.0013). At fibreoptic laryngoscopic examination, the vocal cords or arytenoids, or both, could be seen in 92% of patients in group 1 and in 90% of patients in group 2. Immediate throat soreness was reported in four patients in group 1 and in seven in group 2. The results suggest that the LMA-Unique was similar in clinical performance to the LMA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9691877     DOI: 10.1093/bja/80.5.677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  14 in total

1.  A prospective randomised trial to compare three insertion techniques for i-gel™ placement: Standard, reverse, and rotation.

Authors:  Mamta Bhardwaj; Suresh K Singhal; Amit Dahiya
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-07-01

2.  Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme(TM) Versus Unique(TM) in Edentulous Geriatric Patients.

Authors:  Tangül Beydeş; Semih Küçükgüçlü; Şule Özbilgin; Bahar Kuvaki; Meltem Ademoğlu; Melek Sarı
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-02-01

3.  Randomized comparison of the i-gel™, the LMA Supreme™, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients.

Authors:  Sebastian G Russo; Stephan Cremer; Tamara Galli; Christoph Eich; Anselm Bräuer; Thomas A Crozier; Martin Bauer; Micha Strack
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Randomised Comparison of the AMBU AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask and the LMA Unique Laryngeal Mask Airway in Spontaneously Breathing Adults.

Authors:  Daryl Lindsay Williams; James M Zeng; Karl D Alexander; David T Andrews
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-29

5.  A randomised trial to compare i-gel and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway for airway management in paediatric patients.

Authors:  R Nirupa; Satinder Gombar; Vanita Ahuja; Preeti Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-10

6.  A new laryngeal mask supraglottic airway device with integrated balloon line: a descriptive and comparative bench study.

Authors:  YingHai Zhou; Korinne Jew
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-11-02

7.  A preliminary assessment of the LMA protector™ in non-paralysed patients.

Authors:  Ban Leong Sng; Farida Binte Ithnin; Deepak Mathur; Eileen Lew; Nian-Lin Reena Han; Alex Tiong-Heng Sia
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Insertion of LMA Classic™ with and without digital intraoral manipulation in anesthetized unparalyzed patients.

Authors:  Handattu M Krishna; Shyamsunder Kamath; Laxmi Shenoy
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10

9.  Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Maren Kleine-Brueggeney; Anne Gottfried; Sabine Nabecker; Robert Greif; Malte Book; Lorenz Theiler
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 10.  Extraglottic airway devices: technology update.

Authors:  Bimla Sharma; Chand Sahai; Jayashree Sood
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2017-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.