Literature DB >> 9690113

[Pacemaker therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation].

A Schuchert1, T Meinertz.   

Abstract

Pacemaker therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation means the best current pacemaker therapy for patients with bradycardias with the aim to avoid the onset of atrial fibrillation and to establish DDD pacing despite of a history of atrial tachyarrhythmias. The newer application of pacing is the suppression of atrial arrhythmias in patients with medical refractory atrial tachyarrhythmias. Patients with slow ventricular rates and permanent atrial fibrillation should receive a VVI-pacemaker, if the bradycardias causes syncope, dizziness or a decrease of their exercise tolerance. In case of chronotropic incompetence the pacemaker should provide rate responsive pacing. Patients with sick sinus syndrome should receive an atrial (AAI) or dual-chamber (DDD) pacemaker, because patients with these in contrast to VVI-pacemakers develop less often atrial fibrillation and subsequent complications such as atrial thromboembolism. A dual-chamber or VDD-pacemaker--the latter connected to a VDD-single-lead--is indicated in patients with advanced AV-block. Atrial fibrillation occurs in 3 to 6% of the patients with no history of arrythmia and is, if pacemakers have no automatic mode switch, an often reason to program the devices to the VVI-pacing mode. Nowadays, most DDD(R)-pacemakers provide an automatic mode switch: During an atrial tachycardia the pacemaker switches to a VVI/VVIR mode and restores the initial DDD(R)-pacing mode with termination of the arrhythmia. In respect to the newer applications, one approach to prevent atrial tachyarrhythmias is permanent atrial pacing. As lower pacing rates of 80 to 90 ppm are usually needed and many patients hardly tolerate these pacing rates, new algorithms are under clinical investigation. Another approach is the simultaneous depolarization of the right and left atrium. Biatrial pacing is performed with one lead in the high right atrium and another lead in the coronary sinus. Another solution is bifocal atrial pacing with leads placed in the high right atrium and in the coronary sinus ostium. One effect of the new pacing techniques is to shorten interatrial conduction times. Therefore, biatrial pacing has become a therapy to prevent atrial arrhythmias deriving from delayed interatrial conduction times. As atrial reentry circuits seem to be important in atrial fibrillation, multisite atrial pacing is also performed in patients with medical refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Preliminary results suggest a more effective prevention of atrial fibrillation; nevertheless, these techniques should be still restricted to patients enrolled in clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9690113     DOI: 10.1007/bf03044321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  43 in total

1.  [Intermittent atrial fibrillation/flutter: contraindication for implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker?].

Authors:  A Schuchert; H van Langen; K Michels; T Meinertz
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  1996-04

Review 2.  Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.

Authors:  A B Hesselson; V Parsonnet; A D Bernstein; G J Bonavita
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Effects of different atrial pacing modes on atrial electrophysiology: implicating the mechanism of biatrial pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  W C Yu; S A Chen; C T Tai; A N Feng; M S Chang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-11-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  The pacemaker syndrome.

Authors:  K Ausubel; S Furman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Cardiac output is a sensitive indicator of difference in exercise performance between single and dual sensor pacemakers.

Authors:  S K Leung; C P Lau; M O Tang
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Dual sensor VVIR mode pacing: is it worth it?

Authors:  N Sulke; K Tan; K Kamalvand; J Bostock; C Bucknall
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Prospective study of left ventricular function after radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular junction in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  M Edner; K Caidahl; L Bergfeldt; B Darpö; N Edvardsson; M Rosenqvist
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-09

8.  Reasons for reprogramming dual chamber pacemakers to VVI mode: a retrospective review using a computer database.

Authors:  R Chamberlain-Webber; M E Petersen; A Ingram; L Briers; R Sutton
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  High-density mapping of electrically induced atrial fibrillation in humans.

Authors:  K T Konings; C J Kirchhof; J R Smeets; H J Wellens; O C Penn; M A Allessie
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Long-term follow-up of patients treated by radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular junction.

Authors:  S M Jensen; L Bergfeldt; M Rosenqvist
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.