Literature DB >> 7838780

Reasons for reprogramming dual chamber pacemakers to VVI mode: a retrospective review using a computer database.

R Chamberlain-Webber1, M E Petersen, A Ingram, L Briers, R Sutton.   

Abstract

Seven hundred seventy-one dual chamber pacemakers implanted over a 13-year period were identified using a computer database. The mean follow-up period was 40.4 +/- 30.9 months (mean +/- SD). Thirty-three (4.3%) patients were reprogrammed to the VVI mode after a mean period of 26.4 +/- 29 months. Indications for pacing in those reprogrammed were: complete heart block 45.7%, impaired AV conduction 5.7%, sick sinus syndrome 34.2%, carotid sinus syndrome 11.4%, and vasovagal syndrome 2.8%. The most common reason for reprogramming was development of sustained atrial arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation or flutter), which occurred in 25 patients (3.3% of entire group). The remaining 8 (1% of entire group) were reprogrammed because of atrial lead related problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7838780     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb03739.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Pacemaker therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation].

Authors:  A Schuchert; T Meinertz
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term?

Authors:  B Ibrahim; J E Sanderson; B Wright; R Palmer
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-07

3.  Automatic mode switching in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Stabile; Antonio De Simone; Enrico Romano
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2005-07-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.