Literature DB >> 9682790

Prevention of hip fractures in older women: a population-based perspective.

S R Cummings1.   

Abstract

We now have several means of reducing the risk of fractures. Expert medical treatment of individual patients by modifying risk factors and appropriately prescribing effective supplements and drugs substantially reduces the patient's fracture risk but is not commonly provided to patients. At the moment, women at the greatest risk of fracture appear to be only slightly more likely to receive treatment that reduces fracture risk than women who are at low risk. This strategy seems likely to miss the vast majority of women who account for most of the hip fractures. On the other hand, the impact of strategies to reduce rates of hip fractures in populations critically depends on the reach of the program and adherence with treatment. It is not yet clear that effective population based programs will be affordable or cost-effective. To have a substantial impact on the rates of fractures in populations, we will need to be as energetic and clever in developing these strategies during the next decade as we have been in developing screening devices and new pharmaceuticals during the past one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9682790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  8 in total

1.  Cancer therapy associated bone loss: implications for hip fractures in mid-life women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Beatrice J Edwards; Dennis W Raisch; Veena Shankaran; June M McKoy; William Gradishar; Andrew D Bunta; Athena T Samaras; Simone N Boyle; Charles L Bennett; Dennis P West; Theresa A Guise
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Absolute fracture risk reporting in clinical practice: a physician-centered survey.

Authors:  W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Recognition of osteoporosis by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Stephen H Gehlbach; Maureen Fournier; Carol Bigelow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The near absence of osteoporosis treatment in older men with fractures.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Gregory Nichols; Eric Orwoll; Patricia J Elmer; David H Smith; Michael Herson; Mikel Aickin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Proximal femural fractures: epidemiology.

Authors:  Massimo Innocenti; Roberto Civinini; Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-05

6.  Follow-up treatment for osteoporosis after fracture.

Authors:  Frederick Hooven; Stephen H Gehlbach; Penelope Pekow; Elizabeth Bertone; Evan Benjamin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Treatment of osteopenia.

Authors:  Erik Fink Eriksen
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.514

8.  Burden of fractures in France: incidence and severity by age, gender, and site in 2016.

Authors:  Benjamin Bouyer; Fanny Leroy; Jérémie Rudant; Alain Weill; Joël Coste
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.