Literature DB >> 15221208

Follow-up treatment for osteoporosis after fracture.

Frederick Hooven1, Stephen H Gehlbach, Penelope Pekow, Elizabeth Bertone, Evan Benjamin.   

Abstract

Studies of the management of osteoporosis in older women who have had hip or wrist fractures have found underdiagnosis and undertreatment of the disease. Few such studies have been conducted in the United States, however, and most studies have been confined to a subset of the treatments currently available to treat osteoporosis. Mail surveys were sent to 381 women between 50 and 84 years of age who had been treated for a hip or wrist fracture at a large northeast US teaching hospital between October 1, 1998, and September 30, 2000. These surveys included questions about osteoporosis risk factors and physician treatment both before and after the index fracture. Of 381 surveys mailed, 70 were returned because of an invalid address or by a relative because a patient was deceased. Of the remaining 311 surveys, 147 completed responses were received. Fifty-two percent of respondents reported having received either a prescription or a recommendation for a nonprescription medication used to treat osteoporosis before the fracture. After fracture, 60% of subjects were advised to take any osteoporosis medication, and 42% of were advised to take a prescription medication. Of women reporting no treatment advice before fracture, 33% reported treatment after. Twenty-four percent of patients reported a change in treatment after fracture versus before. No significant differences in treatment were found according to fracture history, maternal history of fracture, or maternal history of osteoporosis. Both prescription and nonprescription treatment prevalence after fracture were lower than expected, and there was only a small change in reported treatment prevalence after fracture versus before. There was also little difference in treatment prevalence based on risk factors for osteoporosis or osteoporotic fractures. A sizeable opportunity exists for intervention to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures for patients who have a history of fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15221208     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1676-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  35 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. I. Systematic reviews of randomized trials in osteoporosis: introduction and methodology.

Authors:  Ann Cranney; Peter Tugwell; George Wells; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 2.  Epidemiology of hip fractures.

Authors:  R G Cumming; M C Nevitt; S R Cummings
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  How well are community-living women treated for osteoporosis after hip fracture?

Authors:  S Bellantonio; R Fortinsky; K Prestwood
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Osteoporosis follow-up after wrist fractures following minor trauma.

Authors:  S A Khan; C de Geus; B Holroyd; A S Russell
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-05-28

6.  Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study.

Authors:  T V Nguyen; J R Center; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Awareness of osteoporosis and compliance with management guidelines in patients with newly diagnosed low-impact fractures.

Authors:  H Castel; D Y Bonneh; M Sherf; Y Liel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Osteoporosis among estrogen-deficient women--United States, 1988-1994.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1998-11-20       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Occurrence and incidence of the second hip fracture.

Authors:  H M Schrøder; K K Petersen; M Erlandsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Insights from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

Authors:  Nelson B Watts
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures.

Authors:  D Bliuc; J A Eisman; J R Center
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Missed opportunities for osteoporosis treatment in patients hospitalized for hip fracture.

Authors:  Lee A Jennings; Andrew D Auerbach; Judith Maselli; Penelope S Pekow; Peter K Lindenauer; Sei J Lee
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Osteoporosis intervention in ambulatory patients with previous hip fracture: a multicentric, nationwide Italian survey.

Authors:  Vincenzo Carnevale; Luciano Nieddu; Elisabetta Romagnoli; Elisabetta Bona; Sara Piemonte; Alfredo Scillitani; Salvatore Minisola
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

Authors:  Gim Gee Teng; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Effect of alendronate in elderly patients after low trauma hip fracture repair.

Authors:  D Cecilia; E Jódar; C Fernández; C Resines; F Hawkins
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-11-01

8.  Cost-effectiveness of multifaceted evidence implementation programs for the prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Authors:  T Beukelman; K G Saag; J R Curtis; M L Kilgore; M Pisu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Osteoporosis primer for the vertebroplasty practitioner: expanding the focus beyond needles and cement.

Authors:  A E Kearns; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Simulation-based cost-utility analysis of population screening-based alendronate use in Switzerland.

Authors:  M Schwenkglenks; K Lippuner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.