Literature DB >> 15928798

The near absence of osteoporosis treatment in older men with fractures.

Adrianne C Feldstein1, Gregory Nichols, Eric Orwoll, Patricia J Elmer, David H Smith, Michael Herson, Mikel Aickin.   

Abstract

The burden of osteoporotic fractures in older men is significant. The objectives of our study were to: (1) characterize older men with fractures associated with osteoporosis, (2) determine if medication treatment rates for osteoporosis are improving and (3) identify patient, healthcare benefit and utilization, and clinician characteristics that are significantly associated with treatment. This retrospective cohort study assessed 1,171 men aged 65 or older with any new fracture associated with osteoporosis between 1 January 1998 and 30 June 2001 in a non-profit health maintenance organization in the United States. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate pre-fracture factors for their association with osteoporosis treatment in the 6-month post-fracture period. The main outcome measure was pharmacologic treatment for osteoporosis in the 6 months after the index fracture. Subjects' average age was 76.7 years; 3.3% had a diagnosis of osteoporosis and 15.2% a diagnosis or medication associated with secondary osteoporosis. Only 7.1% of the study population and 16.0% of those with a hip or vertebral fracture received a medication for osteoporosis following the index fracture, and treatment rates did not improve over time. In the multivariate model, factors significantly associated with drug treatment were a higher value on the Charlson Comorbidity Index (odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.51), having an osteoporosis diagnosis (odds ratio 8.11, 95% confidence interval 3.08-21.3), chronic glucocorticoid use (odds ratio 5.37, 95% confidence interval 2.37-12.2) and a vertebral fracture (odds ratio 16.6, 95% confidence interval 7.8-31.4). Bone mineral density measurement was rare (n =13, 1.1%). Our findings suggest that there is under-ascertainment and under-treatment of osteoporosis and modifiable secondary causes in older men with fractures. Information systems merging diagnostic and treatment information can help delineate gaps in patient management. Interventions showing promise in other conditions should be evaluated to improve care for osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15928798     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1950-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  46 in total

Review 1.  Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; Y Liaw; C A Brandt; G J Corb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Evidence for the effectiveness of techniques To change physician behavior.

Authors:  W R Smith
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study. PROOF Study Group.

Authors:  C H Chesnut; S Silverman; K Andriano; H Genant; A Gimona; S Harris; D Kiel; M LeBoff; M Maricic; P Miller; C Moniz; M Peacock; P Richardson; N Watts; D Baylink
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community.

Authors:  M E Tinetti; M Speechley; S F Ginter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study.

Authors:  J R Center; T V Nguyen; D Schneider; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The predictive value of forearm bone mineral content measurements in men.

Authors:  P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Osteoporosis follow-up after wrist fractures following minor trauma.

Authors:  S A Khan; C de Geus; B Holroyd; A S Russell
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-05-28

9.  Evaluation of osteoporosis treatment in seniors after hip fracture.

Authors:  A G Juby; C M De Geus-Wenceslau
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  50 in total

1.  Undertreatment of osteoporosis in persons with dementia? A population-based study.

Authors:  Y Haasum; J Fastbom; L Fratiglioni; K Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Treatment for older men with fractures.

Authors:  A J Shepherd; A R Cass; L A Ray; A Tan; G S Wilkinson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Improving the treatment of major osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Maureen C Ashe; Karim M Khan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Validation of FRC, a fracture risk assessment tool, in a cohort of older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.

Authors:  Bruce Ettinger; Hau Liu; Terri Blackwell; Andrew R Hoffman; Kristine E Ensrud; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada: an age-period-cohort analysis.

Authors:  Sonia Jean; Siobhan O'Donnell; Claudia Lagacé; Peter Walsh; Christina Bancej; Jacques P Brown; Suzanne Morin; Alexandra Papaioannou; Susan B Jaglal; William D Leslie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Quality of osteoporosis care of older Medicare recipients with fragility fractures: 2006 to 2010.

Authors:  Stephen K Liu; Jeffrey C Munson; John-Erik Bell; Rebecca L Zaha; John N Mecchella; Anna N A Tosteson; Nancy E Morden
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 7.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  Characteristics associated with bone mineral density responses to alendronate in men.

Authors:  Erik D Swenson; Karen E Hansen; Andrea N Jones; Zhanhai Li; Brooke Baltz-Ward; Arthur A Schuna; Mary E Elliott
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Undertreatment of osteoporosis in the oldest old? A nationwide study of over 700,000 older people.

Authors:  Kristina Johnell; Johan Fastbom
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Osteoporosis screening for men: are family physicians following the guidelines?

Authors:  Natalie Cheng; Michael E Green
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.