Literature DB >> 9682641

Variation in the staging of colorectal carcinomas: a survey of current practice.

M G Raraty1, J H Winstanley.   

Abstract

Dukes' staging is the most common means of staging and grouping colorectal carcinomas and is also used to determine which patients will be offered adjuvant therapies or entered into clinical trials. This study was performed to assess the degree of variation in the staging of colorectal carcinomas in normal clinical practice. Seven consultant surgeons and two consultant pathologists returned questionnaires asking them to stage 14 carcinomas on the basis of their pathology reports alone. The results show agreement among all nine in only six out of the 14 cases. In two cases there was a close to 50:50 split in perceived stage. Between them, the nine consultants produced eight different sets of staging results. These results indicate difficulties in the application of Dukes' staging system for several possible reasons. There may be misinterpretation of the written report, misapplication of the staging system because of unfamiliarity or confusion between the various modifications of Dukes' system which have been published. A more precisely defined staging system based on a standard proforma may be more appropriate in modern clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9682641      PMCID: PMC2503027     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  7 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  V B ASTLER; F A COLLER
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Staging of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S T Williams; R W Beart
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr

3.  Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT).

Authors:  L P Fielding; P A Arsenault; P H Chapuis; O Dent; B Gathright; J D Hardcastle; P Hermanek; J R Jass; R C Newland
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.029

4.  The role of the peritoneal reflection in the prognosis of carcinoma of the rectum and sigmoid colon.

Authors:  J W KIRKLIN; M B DOCKERTY; J M WAUGH
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1949-03

5.  Cancer of the colon: the influence of the no-touch isolation technic on survival rates.

Authors:  R B Turnbull; K Kyle; F R Watson; J Spratt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The relationship of survival to staging and grading of colorectal carcinoma: a prospective study of 503 cases.

Authors:  R C Newland; P H Chapuis; M T Pheils; J G MacPherson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The spread of rectal cancer and its effect on prognosis.

Authors:  C E DUKES; H J BUSSEY
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Does the subspecialty of the surgeon performing primary colonic resection influence the outcome of patients with hepatic metastases referred for resection?

Authors:  S J Wigmore; K Madhavan; E J Currie; D C Bartolo; O J Garden
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Lymph node harvests directly influence the staging of colorectal cancer: evidence from a regional audit.

Authors:  D F H Pheby; D F Levine; R W Pitcher; N A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.