Literature DB >> 1615269

Staging of colorectal cancer.

S T Williams1, R W Beart.   

Abstract

A chronological overview of the various staging systems for colorectal cancer is presented in an effort to demonstrate the reason for the current state of confusion. The Dukes 1932 system is considered to be the gold standard because of its simplicity and accuracy and is the system most often referred to in the literature. Number of positive nodes and depth of invasion are two variables that have been found to be predictors of survival. In the future, other prognostic factors such as nuclear morphology, flow cytometric characteristics, histological grade, and vascular or lymphatic invasion may also be entered into the staging equation. Use of the TNM system at this time is recommended since it most completely describes appropriate prognostic factors and allows conversion of other staging systems into a common format. Future modifications could logically evolve from the TNM system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1615269     DOI: 10.1002/ssu.2980080208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1098-2388


  8 in total

1.  Variation in the staging of colorectal carcinomas: a survey of current practice.

Authors:  M G Raraty; J H Winstanley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Advances in the screening and staging of colon and rectal cancers.

Authors:  R W Beart
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-12

3.  Association of Fusobacterium nucleatum infection with colorectal cancer in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Yu-Yuan Li; Quan-Xing Ge; Jie Cao; Yong-Jian Zhou; Yan-Lei Du; Bo Shen; Yu-Jui Yvonne Wan; Yu-Qiang Nie
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Contribution of plasminogen activators and their inhibitors to the survival prognosis of patients with Dukes' stage B and C colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S Ganesh; C F Sier; M M Heerding; J H van Krieken; G Griffioen; K Welvaart; C J van de Velde; J H Verheijen; C B Lamers; H W Verspaget
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  From Dukes-MAC Staging System to Molecular Classification: Evolving Concepts in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Laura Banias; Ioan Jung; Rebeca Chiciudean; Simona Gurzu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Immune-related gene expression signatures in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhenqing Sun; Wei Xia; Yali Lyu; Yanan Song; Min Wang; Ruirui Zhang; Guode Sui; Zhenlu Li; Li Song; Changliang Wu; Choong-Chin Liew; Lei Yu; Guang Cheng; Changming Cheng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Preliminary Comparison of Oral and Intestinal Human Microbiota in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Edda Russo; Giovanni Bacci; Carolina Chiellini; Camilla Fagorzi; Elena Niccolai; Antonio Taddei; Federica Ricci; Maria N Ringressi; Rossella Borrelli; Filippo Melli; Manouela Miloeva; Paolo Bechi; Alessio Mengoni; Renato Fani; Amedeo Amedei
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Association of oncogenic bacteria with colorectal cancer in South China.

Authors:  Youlian Zhou; Hanchang He; Haoming Xu; Yingfei Li; Zhiming Li; Yanlei Du; Jie He; Yongjian Zhou; Hong Wang; Yuqiang Nie
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.