Literature DB >> 9681305

An alternative to "brutacaine": a comparison of low dose intramuscular ketamine with intranasal midazolam in children before suturing.

R G McGlone1, S Ranasinghe, S Durham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of low dose intramuscular ketamine with high dose intranasal midazolam in children before suturing.
METHODS: Altogether 102 children with simple wounds between 1 and 7 years old were allocated to the two study groups.
RESULTS: Two children were excluded from the study because of deviation from the agreed protocol. The 50 children in the ketamine group were less likely to cry or need to be restrained during the procedure than those in the midazolam group (p < 0.01). The median oxygen saturation was 97% in both groups. There was no difference in the recovery behaviour and the range of time at which children were ready for discharge, although the median time for the latter was shorter in the midazolam group (75 v 82 minutes). Vomiting occurred in nine of the ketamine and four of the midazolam group. After discharge both groups had an unsteady gait (73% v 71%) which usually resolved within two hours.
CONCLUSION: Intranasal midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) effectively sedated the children in that none could remember the suturing. However a significant number still had to be restrained (86% v 14%). Intramuscular ketamine (2.5 mg/kg) produced dissociative anaesthesia in the majority of cases and was the preferred drug of nurse, doctor, and parent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9681305      PMCID: PMC1343133          DOI: 10.1136/emj.15.4.231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med        ISSN: 1351-0622


  30 in total

1.  Decreased doses of ketamine hydrochloride in children: a triple blind study.

Authors:  G A Hurwitz; D T DeVore
Journal:  J Baltimore Coll Dent Surg       Date:  1975-07

2.  Intranasal midazolam as a sedative for children during laceration repair.

Authors:  D M Yealy; J H Ellis; G D Hobbs; R M Moscati
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Reducing children's fear when undergoing painful procedures.

Authors:  B Taiwo; M Flowers; N Zoltie
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1992-09

4.  Intranasal administration of ketamine: possible applications.

Authors:  J A Aldrete; L J Russell; F A Davis
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg       Date:  1988

5.  Ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures: Part 1, A prospective series.

Authors:  S M Green; R Nakamura; N E Johnson
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  The pharmacokinetics of midazolam in paediatric patients.

Authors:  K Payne; F J Mattheyse; D Liebenberg; T Dawes
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures: Part 2, Review and implications.

Authors:  S M Green; N E Johnson
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Intramuscular midazolam premedication in small children. A comparison with papaveretum and hyoscine.

Authors:  M B Taylor; P R Vine; D J Hatch
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Nasal midazolam in children, plasma concentrations and the effect on respiration.

Authors:  T Fösel; C Hack; R Knoll; G B Kraus; R Larsen
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.556

10.  Midazolam enhances anterograde but not retrograde amnesia in pediatric patients.

Authors:  R S Twersky; J Hartung; B J Berger; J McClain; C Beaton
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  12 in total

1.  Emergency analgesia in the paediatric population. Part IV Paediatric sedation in the accident and emergency department: pros and cons.

Authors:  E Doyle
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  "Brutacaine" vanquished, but pain remains.

Authors:  J Benger
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Consigning "brutacaine" to history: a survey of pharmacological techniques to facilitate painful procedures in children in emergency departments in the UK.

Authors:  B Loryman; F Davies; G Chavada; T Coats
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam is superior to intranasal midazolam for emergency paediatric procedural sedation.

Authors:  J P Acworth; D Purdie; R C Clark
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Sedation for children requiring wound repair: a randomised controlled double blind comparison of oral midazolam and oral ketamine.

Authors:  P A Younge; J M Kendall
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  A comparison of intramuscular ketamine with high dose intramuscular midazolam with and without intranasal flumazenil in children before suturing.

Authors:  R McGlone; T Fleet; S Durham; S Hollis
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 7.  Ketamine for paediatric sedation/analgesia in the emergency department.

Authors:  M C Howes
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Procedural sedation in paediatric minor procedures: a prospective audit on ketamine use in the emergency department.

Authors:  D Y Ellis; H M Husain; J P Saetta; T Walker
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  The Lancaster experience of 2.0 to 2.5 mg/kg intramuscular ketamine for paediatric sedation: 501 cases and analysis.

Authors:  R G McGlone; M C Howes; M Joshi
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 10.  Midazolam or ketamine for procedural sedation of children in the emergency department.

Authors:  Andrew Munro; Ian Machonochie
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.