Literature DB >> 1388390

Intranasal midazolam as a sedative for children during laceration repair.

D M Yealy1, J H Ellis, G D Hobbs, R M Moscati.   

Abstract

We performed a retrospective chart review to determine the onset, duration, safety, and clinical sedative effects of 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg intranasal midazolam in young children during laceration repair. Of 408 children treated for lacerations during an 8-month period, 42 (10%) received intranasal midazolam. Documentation was adequate for detailed analysis in 40 cases. Data are reported as mean +/- standard deviation and the frequency with 95% confidence limit (CL) estimates. The mean age of the study population was 32 +/- 9 months (range 12 months to 6 years), and the mean body mass was 14.5 +/- 3 kg. Topical or injected local anesthesia was used in 37 cases. Overall, 73% (CL 56% to 85%) of the children achieved adequate sedation. However, those receiving 0.2 to 0.29 mg/kg had adequate sedation in only 27% (CL 6% to 60%) of the cases compared with 80% (CL 52% to 95%) and 100% (CL 79% to 100%) when 0.3 to 0.39 and 0.4 to 0.5 mg/kg respectively were administered. When achieved, sedation occurred within 12 +/- 4 minutes, recovery occurred at 41 +/- 9 minutes, and discharge occurred at 56 +/- 11 minutes. No vomiting or clinically significant oxygen desaturation (defined as a drop of > 4% or to < 91%) was observed. We conclude that intranasal midazolam is a safe and effective sedative for laceration repair under local anesthesia in preschool-aged children. We recommend a dose of 0.3 to 0.5 mg/kg, with treatment failure less likely after 0.4 to 0.5 mg/kg compared with less than 0.3 mg/kg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1388390     DOI: 10.1016/0735-6757(92)90190-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  12 in total

1.  An alternative to "brutacaine": a comparison of low dose intramuscular ketamine with intranasal midazolam in children before suturing.

Authors:  R G McGlone; S Ranasinghe; S Durham
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-07

2.  Optimal Volume of Administration of Intranasal Midazolam in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Daniel S Tsze; Maria Ieni; Daniel B Fenster; John Babineau; Joshua Kriger; Bruce Levin; Peter S Dayan
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Atomised intranasal midazolam spray as premedication in pediatric patients: comparison between two doses of 0.2 and 0.3 mg/kg.

Authors:  Namita M Baldwa; Amit V Padvi; Nandini M Dave; Madhu B Garasia
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam is superior to intranasal midazolam for emergency paediatric procedural sedation.

Authors:  J P Acworth; D Purdie; R C Clark
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  A comparison of intramuscular ketamine with high dose intramuscular midazolam with and without intranasal flumazenil in children before suturing.

Authors:  R McGlone; T Fleet; S Durham; S Hollis
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  A randomized clinical trial comparing oral, aerosolized intranasal, and aerosolized buccal midazolam.

Authors:  Eileen J Klein; Julie C Brown; Ana Kobayashi; Daniel Osincup; Kristy Seidel
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Intranasal midazolam plasma concentration profile and its effect on anxiety associated with dental procedures.

Authors:  A H Burstein; R Modica; M Hatton; F M Gengo
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1996

Review 8.  Comparative review of the adverse effects of sedatives used in children undergoing outpatient procedures.

Authors:  J D'Agostino; T E Terndrup
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Comparative Evaluation of the Intranasal Spray Formulation of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine in Patients Undergoing Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Split Mouth Prospective Study.

Authors:  Shashank Hiwarkar; Rajesh Kshirsagar; Vikram Singh; Amod Patankar; Sanjay Chandan; Mukund Rathod; Ajay Mohite
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-12-18

10.  Intranasal midazolam may prevent gagging reflex: a case report.

Authors:  Meral Arslan Malkoc; Necla Demir; Zehra Ileri; Aybuke Erdur; Seza Apiliogullari
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2013-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.