Literature DB >> 15221062

[Breast cancer. Sonography and magnetic resonance mammography].

S Delorme1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in women: Almost 10% will suffer from breast cancer during their life; almost half of these will die of it. The spectrum of radiologic methods for diagnosing breast cancer is wide, including X-ray mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance mammography, and minimally invasive biopsies. This second part of two covers ultrasound of the breast and magnetic resonance mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15221062     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-004-1064-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  59 in total

1.  Fibroadenomas: MR imaging appearances with radiologic-histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  M G Hochman; S G Orel; C M Powell; M D Schnall; C A Reynolds; L N White
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Ultrasound contrast agents. State of the art.

Authors:  R F Mattrey; G C Steinbach
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Effects of a microbubble contrast agent on breast tumors: computer-assisted quantitative assessment with color Doppler US--early experience.

Authors:  S Huber; T Helbich; J Kettenbach; W Dock; I Zuna; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors.

Authors:  M V Knopp; E Weiss; H P Sinn; J Mattern; H Junkermann; J Radeleff; A Magener; G Brix; S Delorme; I Zuna; G van Kaick
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Induction of angiogenesis during the transition from hyperplasia to neoplasia.

Authors:  J Folkman; K Watson; D Ingber; D Hanahan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Breast tumors: computer-assisted quantitative assessment with color Doppler US.

Authors:  S Huber; S Delorme; M V Knopp; H Junkermann; I Zuna; D von Fournier; G van Kaick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  [Value of MR tomography in inconclusive mammography findings].

Authors:  W Buchberger; P DeKoekkoek-Doll; P Obrist; M Dünser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Silicone breast implant rupture: comparison between three-point Dixon and fast spin-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  D P Gorczyca; E Schneider; N D DeBruhl; T K Foo; C Y Ahn; J W Sayre; W W Shaw; L W Bassett
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Dormancy of micrometastases: balanced proliferation and apoptosis in the presence of angiogenesis suppression.

Authors:  L Holmgren; M S O'Reilly; J Folkman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent.

Authors:  C Boetes; R D Mus; R Holland; J O Barentsz; S P Strijk; T Wobbes; J H Hendriks; S H Ruys
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Breast cancer imaging].

Authors:  M Funke; C Villena
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  The effect of accompanying in situ ductal carcinoma on accuracy of measuring malignant breast tumor size using B-mode ultrasonography and real-time sonoelastography.

Authors:  A A Soliman; S Wojcinski; F Degenhardt
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-09-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.