Literature DB >> 9671069

Statewide regionalization of pancreaticoduodenectomy and its effect on in-hospital mortality.

T A Gordon1, H M Bowman, J M Tielsch, E B Bass, G P Burleyson, J L Cameron.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined a statewide trend in Maryland toward regionalization of pancreaticoduodenectomy over a 12-year period and its effect on statewide in-hospital mortality rates for this procedure. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have demonstrated that the best outcomes are achieved in centers performing large numbers of pancreaticoduodenectomies, which suggests that regionalization could lower the overall in-hospital mortality rate for this procedure.
METHODS: Maryland state hospital discharge data were used to select records of patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy between 1984 and 1995. Hospitals were classified into high-volume and low-volume provider groups. Trends in surgical volume and mortality rates were examined by provider group and for the entire state. Regression analyses were used to examine whether hospital share of pancreaticoduodenectomies was a significant predictor of the in-hospital mortality rate, adjusting for study year and patient characteristics. The portion of the decline in the statewide in-hospital mortality rate for this procedure attributable to the high-volume provider's increasing share was determined.
RESULTS: A total of 795 pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed in Maryland at 43 hospitals from 1984 to 1995 (Maryland residents only). During this period, one institution increased its yearly share of pancreaticoduodenectomies from 20.7% to 58.5%, and the statewide in-hospital mortality rate for the procedure decreased from 17.2% to 4.9%. After adjustment for patient characteristics and study year, hospital share remained a significant predictor of mortality. An estimated 61% of the decline in the statewide in-hospital mortality rate for the procedure was attributable to the increase in share of discharges at the high-volume provider.
CONCLUSIONS: A trend toward regionalization of pancreaticoduodenectomy over a 12-year period in Maryland was associated with a significant decrease in the statewide in-hospital mortality rate for this procedure, demonstrating the effectiveness of regionalization for high-risk surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9671069      PMCID: PMC1191430          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199807000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  10 in total

1.  The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure.

Authors:  T A Gordon; G P Burleyson; J M Tielsch; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Life, money, quality: the impact of regionalization on perinatal/neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  L C Grassi
Journal:  Neonatal Netw       Date:  1988-02

3.  Institutes of Quality: Prudential's approach to outcomes management for specialty procedures.

Authors:  D Dragalin; D Perkins; D W Plocher
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1990-03

4.  Selecting categories of patients for regionalization. Implications of the relationship between volume and outcome.

Authors:  S C Maerki; H S Luft; S S Hunt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Medicare-designated centers for cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  D G Renlund; M R Bristow; M R Lybbert; J B O'Connell; W A Gay
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Regionalization of cardiac surgery in the United States and Canada. Geographic access, choice, and outcomes.

Authors:  K Grumbach; G M Anderson; H S Luft; L L Roos; R Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-10-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Epidemiology of and risk factors for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  E B Gold
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.

Authors:  H S Luft; J P Bunker; A C Enthoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Impact of a trauma system on outcome of severely injured patients.

Authors:  S R Shackford; R C Mackersie; D B Hoyt; W G Baxt; A B Eastman; F N Hammill; F B Knotts; R W Virgilio
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1987-05

10.  Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy.

Authors:  M D Lieberman; H Kilburn; M Lindsey; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 12.969

  10 in total
  67 in total

1.  Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy determines length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  A S Rosemurgy; M Bloomston; F M Serafini; B Coon; M M Murr; L C Carey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Analysis of the quality and efficiency in learning laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  K T den Boer; L T de Wit; P H Davids; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The Leapfrog volume criteria may fall short in identifying high-quality surgical centers.

Authors:  Caprice K Christian; Michael L Gustafson; Rebecca A Betensky; Jennifer Daley; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Pancreatoduodenectomy with or without early ligation of the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery: comparison of intraoperative blood loss and short-term outcome.

Authors:  Yoichi Ishizaki; Hiroyuki Sugo; Jiro Yoshimoto; Hiroshi Imamura; Seiji Kawasaki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Peri-operative outcomes for pancreatoduodenectomy in India: a multi-centric study.

Authors:  Parul J Shukla; Savio G Barreto; Mms Bedi; N Bheerappa; Adarsh Chaudhary; Md Gandhi; M Jacob; S Jesvanth; Dg Kannan; Vinay K Kapoor; A Kumar; Kk Maudar; Hariharan Ramesh; Ra Sastry; Rajan Saxena; Ajit Sewkani; S Sharma; Shailesh V Shrikhande; A Singh; Rajneesh K Singh; R Surendran; Subodh Varshney; V Verma; V Vimalraj
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Florida: do 20-year trends document the salutary benefits of centralization of care?

Authors:  Carrie E Ryan; Thomas W Wood; Sharona B Ross; Amanda E Smart; Prashant B Sukharamwala; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Achieving good perioperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a low-volume setting: a 25-year experience.

Authors:  Aljamir D Chedid; Marcio F Chedid; Leonardo V Winkelmann; Tomaz J M Grezzana Filho; Cleber D P Kruel
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-04

8.  Radical surgical resection for carcinoid tumors of the ampulla.

Authors:  Shin Hwang; Sung-Gyu Lee; Young-Joo Lee; Duck-Jong Han; Song-Cheol Kim; Sea-Hyun Kwon; Je-Ho Ryu; Jung-Ik Park; Hyo-Jun Lee; Ga-Won Choi; Eun-Sil Yu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Analysis of risk factors for hemorrhage and related outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy in an intermediate-volume center.

Authors:  Fabio Uggeri; Luca Nespoli; Marta Sandini; Anita Andreano; Luca Degrate; Fabrizio Romano; Laura Antolini; Luca Gianotti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2019-08-02

Review 10.  Evidence-based pancreatic head resection for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Markus Schäfer; Beat Müllhaupt; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.