Literature DB >> 7487211

Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy.

M D Lieberman1, H Kilburn, M Lindsey, M F Brennan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the effect of hospital and surgeon volume on perioperative mortality rates after pancreatic resection for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
METHODS: Discharge abstracts from 1972 patients who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy for malignancy in New York State between 1984 and 1991 were obtained from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between hospital and surgeon experience to perioperative outcome.
RESULTS: More than 75% of patients underwent resection at minimal-volume (fewer than 10 cases) or low-volume (10-50 cases) centers (defined as hospitals in which a minimal number of resections were performed in a given year), and these hospitals represented 98% of the institutions treating peripancreatic cancer. The two high-volume hospitals (more than 81 cases) demonstrated a significantly lower perioperative mortality rate (4.0%) compared with the minimal- (21.8%) and low-volume (12.3%) hospitals (p < 0.001). The perioperative mortality rate was 15.5% for low-volume (fewer than 9 cases) surgeons (defined as surgeons who had performed a minimal number of resections in any hospital in a given year) (n = 687) compared with 4.7% for high-volume (more than 41 cases) pancreatic surgeons (n = 4) (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that perioperative death is significantly (p < 0.05) related to hospital volume, but the surgeon's experience is not significantly related to perioperative deaths when hospital volume is controlled.
CONCLUSIONS: These data support a defined minimum hospital experience for elective pancreatectomy for malignancy to minimize perioperative deaths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7487211      PMCID: PMC1234991          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199511000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  17 in total

1.  TREATMENT OF CARCINOMA OF THE AMPULLA OF VATER.

Authors:  A O Whipple; W B Parsons; C R Mullins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1935-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Coronary artery bypass grafting. The relationship of surgical volume, hospital location, and outcome.

Authors:  J Zelen; T V Bilfinger; C E Anagnostopoulos
Journal:  N Y State J Med       Date:  1991-07

3.  Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality.

Authors:  M Trede; G Schwall; H D Saeger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals.

Authors:  E L Hannan; J F O'Donnell; H Kilburn; H R Bernard; A Yazici
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Pancreatoduodenectomy: a retrospective review 1949 to 1969.

Authors:  P B Lansing; J B Blalock; J L Ochsner
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  The relation between experience and outcome in heart transplantation.

Authors:  G L Laffel; A I Barnett; S Finkelstein; M P Kaye
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-10-22       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Improved hospital morbidity, mortality, and survival after the Whipple procedure.

Authors:  D W Crist; J V Sitzmann; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The complications of pancreatectomy.

Authors:  M Trede; G Schwall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Decreased morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  P A Grace; H A Pitt; R K Tompkins; L DenBesten; W P Longmire
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  An analysis of the reduced morbidity and mortality rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  C A Pellegrini; C F Heck; S Raper; L W Way
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1989-07
View more
  163 in total

1.  Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; M Hossain; D Soybel; K W Kizer; J B Aust; R H Bell; V Chong; J Demakis; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy determines length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  A S Rosemurgy; M Bloomston; F M Serafini; B Coon; M M Murr; L C Carey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Prostate cancer from a patient's perspective.

Authors:  D Grundy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Understanding obesity.

Authors:  J D Douketis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The more the better?

Authors:  M Simunovic; T To; B Langer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Understanding obesity.

Authors:  T M Stein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Preoperative biliary drainage and surgical outcome.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Analysis of the quality and efficiency in learning laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  K T den Boer; L T de Wit; P H Davids; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system.

Authors:  M Simunovic; T To; M Theriault; B Langer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-03-09       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  More procedures, better quality of care? Is there a case for regionalization of pancreatic resection for neoplasm?

Authors:  M J Wexler
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-03-09       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.