Literature DB >> 9667685

Psychological predictors of attendance at annual breast screening examinations.

M V Burton1, R Warren, D Price, H Earl.   

Abstract

This retrospective analysis of psychological predictors of attendance studied the women from the annual screening arm of the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research (UKCCCR) trial of annual screening mammography for the early detection of breast cancer. Some women attended screening at the first invitation in year 1 (attenders), others did not attend for screening at any time (non-attenders), whereas a third group delayed attending until year 2 (ambivalent attenders). A total of 147 women were recruited to the study: 80 attenders, 28 non-attenders and 39 ambivalent attenders. It proved extremely difficult to contact non-attenders to take part in the study. Non-attenders were significantly more depressed on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; had experienced more miscarriages, stillbirths or terminations of pregnancy; were less knowledgeable about mammography; and were displeased to have received an invitation to screening. Whereas non-attenders are unlikely ever to attend breast screening because of their long-standing attitudes and preferred coping styles, ambivalent attenders may become more amenable to screening with the passage of time. In this study such women were persuaded to attend in year 2 with a simple, cost-effective intervention: an additional invitation letter after a year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9667685      PMCID: PMC2150324          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  62 in total

1.  Compliance with breast cancer screening achieved by the Aylesbury Vale mobile service (1984-1988).

Authors:  E M Williams; M P Vessey
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1990-02

2.  Mobile breast screening: factors affecting uptake, efforts to increase response and acceptability.

Authors:  D C Haiart; L McKenzie; J Henderson; W Pollock; D V McQueen; M M Roberts; A P Forrest
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.427

3.  Compliance with the screening mammography program of British Columbia: will she return?

Authors:  M M Johnson; T G Hislop; L Kan; A J Coldman; A Lai
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1996 May-Jun

Review 4.  Participation in breast screening programs: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon; E A Laville; G L Jackson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  "Sympathy for my body": breast cancer and mammography at two Atlanta clinics.

Authors:  H Wardlow; R H Curry
Journal:  Med Anthropol       Date:  1996-03

6.  Motivational factors for participation in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  T G Frazier; P D Cummings
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Implications of preventive health behaviour for cervical and breast cancer screening programmes: a review.

Authors:  A Bowling
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Beliefs, knowledge, and behavior about cancer among urban Hispanic women.

Authors:  C Morgan; E Park; D E Cortes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1995

9.  Participation in a women's breast cancer risk counseling trial. Who participates? Who declines? High Risk Breast Cancer Consortium.

Authors:  B K Rimer; J M Schildkraut; C Lerman; T H Lin; J Audrain
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Factors determining compliance with screening mammography.

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; F Béland; D Roy; M Falardeau; G Hébert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Depression as a risk factor for underuse of mammography.

Authors:  Hillary R Bogner; Marsha N Wittink
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Disparities in knowledge of mouth or throat cancer among rural Floridians.

Authors:  Joseph L Riley; Elizabeth A Pomery; Virginia J Dodd; Keith E Muller; Yi Guo; Henrietta L Logan
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Effect of health care system distrust on breast and cervical cancer screening in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Tse-Chuan Yang; Stephen A Matthews; Marianne M Hillemeier
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Exploring cancer screening in the context of unmet mental health needs: a participatory pilot study.

Authors:  Abigail Williams; Jennifer Erb-Downward; Emilie Bruzelius; Ellen O'Hara-Cicero; Alison Maling; Lauren Machin; Meiling Viera-Delgado; Pamela Valera; Nicole Maysonet; Elisa S Weiss
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2013

5.  Moving mammogram-reluctant women to screening: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mary E Costanza; Roger Luckmann; Mary Jo White; Milagros C Rosal; Nancy LaPelle; Caroline Cranos
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2009-06-11

6.  Psychological distress as a barrier to preventive healthcare among U.S. women.

Authors:  Whitney P Witt; Robert Kahn; Lisa Fortuna; Jonathan Winickoff; Karen Kuhlthau; Paul A Pirraglia; Timothy Ferris
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2009-08-19

7.  Relationship between anxiety level and radiological investigation. Comparison among different diagnostic imaging exams in a prospective single-center study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lo Re; Rossella De Luca; Filippa Muscarneri; Patrizia Dorangricchia; Dario Picone; Federica Vernuccio; Sergio Salerno; Giuseppe La Tona; Antonio Pinto; Massimo Midiri; Antonio Russo; Roberto Lagalla; Giuseppe Cicero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Staging mammography nonadherent women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nancy LaPelle; Mary E Costanza; Roger Luckmann; Milagros C Rosal; Mary Jo White; Jennifer Rider Stark
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.771

9.  Psychosocial factors and attendance at a population-based mammography screening program in a cohort of Swedish women.

Authors:  Magdalena Lagerlund; Jessica M Sontrop; Sophia Zackrisson
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Personality and gastric cancer screening attendance: a cross-sectional analysis from the Miyagi Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shizuha Arai; Naoki Nakaya; Masako Kakizaki; Kaori Ohmori-Matsuda; Taichi Shimazu; Shinichi Kuriyama; Akira Fukao; Ichiro Tsuji
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 3.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.