Literature DB >> 9660924

T. brucei RNA editing: adenosine nucleotides inversely affect U-deletion and U-insertion reactions at mRNA cleavage.

J Cruz-Reyes1, L N Rusché, K J Piller, B Sollner-Webb.   

Abstract

In the currently envisioned mechanism of trypanosome mitochondrial RNA editing, U-insertion and U-deletion cycles begin with a common kind of gRNA-directed cleavage. However, natural, altered, and mutationally interconverted editing sites reveal that U-deletional cleavage is inefficient without and activated by ATP and ADP, while U-insertional cleavage shows completely reverse nucleotide effects. The adenosine nucleotides' effects appear to be allosteric and determined solely by sequences immediately adjacent to the anchor duplex. Both U-deletional and U-insertional cleavages are reasonably active at physiological mitochondrial ATP concentration. Notably, ATP and ADP markedly stimulate complete U-deletion and inhibit U-insertion reactions, reflecting their effects on cleavage. These plus previous results suggest that U deletion and U insertion are remarkably distinct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9660924     DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80040-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  42 in total

1.  Trypanosome RNA editing: simple guide RNA features enhance U deletion 100-fold.

Authors:  J Cruz-Reyes; A Zhelonkina; L Rusche; B Sollner-Webb
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Kinetoplastid RNA editing does not require the terminal 3' hydroxyl of guide RNA, but modifications to the guide RNA terminus can inhibit in vitro U insertion.

Authors:  M L Burgess; S Heidmann; K Stuart
Journal:  RNA       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Uridylate addition and RNA ligation contribute to the specificity of kinetoplastid insertion RNA editing.

Authors:  R P Igo; S S Palazzo; M L Burgess; A K Panigrahi; K Stuart
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  The specificity of nucleotide removal during RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  S D Lawson; R P Igo; R Salavati; K D Stuart
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.942

5.  Roles for ligases in the RNA editing complex of Trypanosoma brucei: band IV is needed for U-deletion and RNA repair.

Authors:  C E Huang; J Cruz-Reyes; A G Zhelonkina; S O'Hearn; E Wirtz; B Sollner-Webb
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-09-03       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  A mRNA determinant of gRNA-directed kinetoplastid editing.

Authors:  A L Kabb; L M Oppegard; B A McKenzie; G J Connell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Assembly and function of the RNA editing complex in Trypanosoma brucei requires band III protein.

Authors:  Catherine E Huang; Sean F O'Hearn; Barbara Sollner-Webb
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Role of uridylate-specific exoribonuclease activity in Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing.

Authors:  Robert P Igo; David S Weston; Nancy Lewis Ernst; Aswini K Panigrahi; Reza Salavati; Kenneth Stuart
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2002-02

9.  Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing complex: band II is structurally critical and maintains band V ligase, which is nonessential.

Authors:  Sean F O'Hearn; Catherine E Huang; Mike Hemann; Alevtina Zhelonkina; Barbara Sollner-Webb
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Sequence and structural requirements for optimal guide RNA-directed insertional editing within Leishmania tarentolae.

Authors:  Raj D Pai; Lisa M Oppegard; Gregory J Connell
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.