Literature DB >> 9653695

Creighton Model NaProEducation Technology for avoiding pregnancy. Use effectiveness.

T W Hilgers1, J B Stanford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use effectiveness of Creighton Model (CrM) NaProEducation Technology for avoiding pregnancy. STUDY
DESIGN: CrM is a medical model of natural procreation education that is a fully standardized modification of the Billings ovulation method. This system has been used as a means to avoid pregnancy and has been prospectively evaluated in five use effectiveness studies. A prospective life-table analysis of the five studies (meta-analysis) was undertaken, yielding both net and gross rates. Discontinuation rates were also calculated. These studies were conducted at CrM centers in Omaha, St. Louis, Wichita, Houston, and Milwaukee.
RESULTS: A total of 1,876 couples used CrM NET for a total of 17,130.0 couple months of use. The method and use effectiveness rates for avoiding pregnancy were 99.5 and 96.8 at the 12th ordinal month and 99.5 and 96.4 at the 18th ordinal month, respectively. The discontinuation rate was 11.3% at the 12th ordinal month and 12.1% at the 18th ordinal month.
CONCLUSION: CrM is highly effective as a means of avoiding pregnancy in both its method and use effectiveness. The method effectiveness has remained stable over the years of the studies, but the use effectiveness for avoiding pregnancy appears to have improved over the study period.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9653695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  9 in total

1.  Natural procreative technology for infertility and recurrent miscarriage: outcomes in a Canadian family practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tham; Karen Schliep; Joseph Stanford
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The Use of NFP When Pregnancy Is Contraindicated?

Authors:  Justo Aznar; Julio Tudela
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-02-11

3.  Bioethical and Moral Perspectives in Human Reproductive Medicine.

Authors:  Joseph V Turner; Lucas A McLindon
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-01-03

4.  The Identification of Postovulation Infertility with the Measurement of Early Luteal Phase (Peak Day +3) Progesterone Production.

Authors:  Thomas W Hilgers
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-11-13

5.  Hormonal Contraception and the Informed Consent.

Authors:  David J Hilger; Kathleen M Raviele; Teresa A Hilgers
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-12-04

6.  Enrollment, Childbearing Motivations, and Intentions of Couples in the Creighton Model Effectiveness, Intentions, and Behaviors Assessment (CEIBA) Study.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Christina A Porucznik
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-09-08

7.  Cervical-Vaginal Mucin in Fertility Assessment: CA125 as a Predictor of the Fertile Phase of the Normal Menstrual Cycle.

Authors:  A Alexandre Trindade; Stephen J Usala
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  The Fertility Indicator Equation Using Serum Progesterone and Urinary Pregnanediol-3-Glucuronide for Assessment of Ovulatory to Luteal Phase Transition.

Authors:  Stephen J Usala; María Elena Alliende; A Alexandre Trindade
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.430

9.  Successful pregnancy with restorative reproductive medicine after 16 years of infertility, three recurrent miscarriages, and eight unsuccessful embryo transfers with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a case report.

Authors:  Phil C Boyle; Joseph B Stanford; Ivana Zecevic
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.