Literature DB >> 32431450

The Identification of Postovulation Infertility with the Measurement of Early Luteal Phase (Peak Day +3) Progesterone Production.

Thomas W Hilgers1,2.   

Abstract

This study reports on 632 cycles from 105 women who were using the CREIGHTON MODEL FertilityCare™ System to avoid pregnancy and had either a serious reason to avoid pregnancy or some degree of a lack of confidence. A progesterone level was drawn on the third day after the Peak Day as they were charting, and if the progesterone level was 2.3 ng/mL or greater, then ovulation was determined to have passed. If the level was greater than 3.0 ng/mL, this indicated that an absolute period of infertility had begun. In these cases, no pregnancies were observed. In the 27 cycles in which a specific follow-up relative to pregnancy could not be definitively determined, the progesterone levels in all cases were 2.3 ng/mL or greater with 23 of the 27 cycles being 3.1 ng/mL or greater. It is highly unlikely that any of those became pregnant as well. These cycles were collected over thirteen years (2004-2016). Two case presentations are also a part of this article of two families in which the couples had very serious reasons to avoid pregnancy. In these two couples, each of the women was multi-gravid and had no evidence of subfertility or infertility. They used the family planning progesterone level (the Peak Day +3 progesterone level) for a total of 167 cycles over a number of years successfully without a subsequent pregnancy.
SUMMARY: This article presents a thirteen-year effort to evaluate the serum progesterone level on the third day after the Peak Day as observed by women charting the CREIGHTON MODEL FertilityCare™ System. It is known that the Peak Day is associated with ovulation, and if the progesterone reaches a certain level, then an absolute period of infertility should follow. In fact, this is what this study reflects. © Catholic Medical Association 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CREIGHTON MODEL FertilityCare™ System; Luteal phase; NaProTechnology; National hormone laboratory; Natural infertility; Natural methods; Peak Day +3; Progesterone

Year:  2019        PMID: 32431450      PMCID: PMC7016439          DOI: 10.1177/0024363919885551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  4 in total

1.  Creighton Model NaProEducation Technology for avoiding pregnancy. Use effectiveness.

Authors:  T W Hilgers; J B Stanford
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Symptoms and hormonal changes accompanying ovulation.

Authors:  E L Billings; J B Brown; J J Billings; H G Burger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-02-05       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Relation between ultrasonographic evidence of ovulation and hormonal parameters: luteinizing hormone surge and initial progesterone rise.

Authors:  L C Wetzels; H J Hoogland
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Natural family planning. I. The peak symptom and estimated time of ovulation.

Authors:  T W Hilgers; G E Abraham; D Cavanagh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 7.661

  4 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Women's Health and Family Planning.

Authors:  Marguerite Duane; Joseph B Stanford; Christina A Porucznik; Pilar Vigil
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.