Literature DB >> 9651893

Kinematic characterization of wheelchair propulsion.

S D Shimada1, R N Robertson, M L Bonninger, R A Cooper.   

Abstract

Rehabilitation scientists and biomedical engineers have been investigating wheelchair propulsion biomechanics in order to prevent musculoskeletal injuries. Several studies have investigated wheelchair propulsion biomechanics; however, few have examined wheelchair propulsion stroke patterns. The purpose of this study was to characterize wheelchair propulsion stroke patterns by investigating joint accelerations, joint range of motions, wheelchair propulsion phases, and stroke efficiency. Seven experienced wheelchair users (5 males, 2 females) were filmed using a three-camera motion analysis system. Each subject pushed a standard wheelchair fitted with a force-sensing pushrim (SMARTWheel) at two speeds (1.3 and 2.2 m/s). The elbow angle was analyzed in the sagittal plane, while the shoulder joint was analyzed in the sagittal and frontal planes. Three distinctly different stroke patterns: semi-circular (SC), single looping-over-propulsion (SLOP), and double looping-over-propulsion (DLOP), were identified from the kinematic analysis. Through our analysis of these patterns, we hypothesized that SC was more biomechanically efficient than the other stroke patterns. Future studies using a larger number of subjects and strokes may reveal more significant distinctions in efficiency measures between stroke patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9651893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  20 in total

Review 1.  Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair sports.

Authors:  Y Vanlandewijck; D Theisen; D Daly
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Preservation of upper limb function following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Shoulder pain and jerk during recovery phase of manual wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Chandrasekaran Jayaraman; Carolyn L Beck; Jacob J Sosnoff
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Effect of choice of recovery patterns on handrim kinetics in manual wheelchair users with paraplegia and tetraplegia.

Authors:  Shashank Raina; Jill McNitt-Gray; Sara Mulroy; Philip Requejo
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Scapular Stabilization and Muscle Strength in Manual Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injury and Subacromial Impingement.

Authors:  Susan R Wilbanks; C Scott Bickel
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2016

6.  Biomechanic evaluation of upper-extremity symmetry during manual wheelchair propulsion over varied terrain.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Melissa M Morrow; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 7.  Instruments and techniques for the analysis of wheelchair propulsion and upper extremity involvement in patients with spinal cord injuries: current concept review.

Authors:  Fabio Dellabiancia; Giuseppe Porcellini; Giovanni Merolla
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2013-08-11

8.  The influence of speed and grade on wheelchair propulsion hand pattern.

Authors:  Jonathan S Slowik; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  The influence of wheelchair propulsion hand pattern on upper extremity muscle power and stress.

Authors:  Jonathan S Slowik; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  The influence of wheelchair propulsion technique on upper extremity muscle demand: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jeffery W Rankin; Andrew M Kwarciak; W Mark Richter; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.