Jonathan S Slowik1, Philip S Requejo2, Sara J Mulroy3, Richard R Neptune4. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. 2. Pathokinesiology Laboratory, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA, USA; Rehabilitation Engineering, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA, USA. 3. Pathokinesiology Laboratory, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA, USA. 4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. Electronic address: rneptune@mail.utexas.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The hand pattern used during manual wheelchair propulsion (i.e., full-cycle hand path) can provide insight into an individual's propulsion technique. However, previous analyses of hand patterns have been limited by their focus on a single propulsion condition and reliance on subjective qualitative characterization methods. The purpose of this study was to develop a set of objective quantitative parameters to characterize hand patterns and determine the influence of propulsion speed and grade of incline on the patterns preferred by manual wheelchair users. METHODS: Kinematic and kinetic data were collected from 170 experienced manual wheelchair users on an ergometer during three conditions: level propulsion at their self-selected speed, level propulsion at their fastest comfortable speed and graded propulsion (8%) at their level self-selected speed. Hand patterns were quantified using a set of objective parameters, and differences across conditions were identified. FINDINGS: Increased propulsion speed resulted in a shift away from under-rim hand patterns. Increased grade of incline resulted in the hand remaining near the handrim throughout the cycle. INTERPRETATION: Manual wheelchair users change their hand pattern based on task-specific constraints and goals. Further work is needed to investigate how differences between hand patterns influence upper extremity demand and potentially lead to the development of overuse injuries and pain.
BACKGROUND: The hand pattern used during manual wheelchair propulsion (i.e., full-cycle hand path) can provide insight into an individual's propulsion technique. However, previous analyses of hand patterns have been limited by their focus on a single propulsion condition and reliance on subjective qualitative characterization methods. The purpose of this study was to develop a set of objective quantitative parameters to characterize hand patterns and determine the influence of propulsion speed and grade of incline on the patterns preferred by manual wheelchair users. METHODS: Kinematic and kinetic data were collected from 170 experienced manual wheelchair users on an ergometer during three conditions: level propulsion at their self-selected speed, level propulsion at their fastest comfortable speed and graded propulsion (8%) at their level self-selected speed. Hand patterns were quantified using a set of objective parameters, and differences across conditions were identified. FINDINGS: Increased propulsion speed resulted in a shift away from under-rim hand patterns. Increased grade of incline resulted in the hand remaining near the handrim throughout the cycle. INTERPRETATION: Manual wheelchair users change their hand pattern based on task-specific constraints and goals. Further work is needed to investigate how differences between hand patterns influence upper extremity demand and potentially lead to the development of overuse injuries and pain.
Authors: Alicia M Koontz; Yusheng Yang; David S Boninger; John Kanaly; Rory A Cooper; Michael L Boninger; Kathy Dieruf; Lynette Ewer Journal: Assist Technol Date: 2006
Authors: K Kulig; S S Rao; S J Mulroy; C J Newsam; J K Gronley; E L Bontrager; J Perry Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Alicia M Koontz; Lynn A Worobey; Ian M Rice; Jennifer L Collinger; Michael L Boninger Journal: J Appl Biomech Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 1.833
Authors: Shelby L Walford; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Jonathan S Slowik; Jill L McNitt-Gray; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 2.063