OBJECTIVE: To evaluate upper-extremity symmetry during wheelchair propulsion across multiple terrain surfaces. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: A biomechanics laboratory and the general community. PARTICIPANTS: Manual wheelchair users (N=12). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symmetry indexes for the propulsion moment, total force, tangential force, fractional effective force, time-to-peak propulsion moment, work, length of push cycle, and power during wheelchair propulsion over outdoor and indoor community conditions, and in laboratory conditions. RESULTS: Upper-extremity asymmetry was present within each condition. There were no differences in the magnitude of asymmetry when comparing laboratory with indoor community conditions. Outdoor community wheelchair propulsion asymmetry was significantly greater than asymmetry measured during laboratory conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators should be aware that manual wheelchair propulsion is an asymmetrical act, which may influence interpretation when data is collected from a single limb or averaged for both limbs. The greater asymmetry identified during outdoor versus laboratory conditions emphasizes the need to evaluate wheelchair biomechanics in the user's natural environment.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate upper-extremity symmetry during wheelchair propulsion across multiple terrain surfaces. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: A biomechanics laboratory and the general community. PARTICIPANTS: Manual wheelchair users (N=12). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symmetry indexes for the propulsion moment, total force, tangential force, fractional effective force, time-to-peak propulsion moment, work, length of push cycle, and power during wheelchair propulsion over outdoor and indoor community conditions, and in laboratory conditions. RESULTS: Upper-extremity asymmetry was present within each condition. There were no differences in the magnitude of asymmetry when comparing laboratory with indoor community conditions. Outdoor community wheelchair propulsion asymmetry was significantly greater than asymmetry measured during laboratory conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators should be aware that manual wheelchair propulsion is an asymmetrical act, which may influence interpretation when data is collected from a single limb or averaged for both limbs. The greater asymmetry identified during outdoor versus laboratory conditions emphasizes the need to evaluate wheelchair biomechanics in the user's natural environment.
Authors: Michael L Boninger; Aaron L Souza; Rory A Cooper; Shirley G Fitzgerald; Alicia M Koontz; Brian T Fay Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Rory A Cooper; Carmen P DiGiovine; Michael L Boninger; Sean D Shimada; Alicia M Koontz; Mark A Baldwin Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2002 May-Jun
Authors: Michael L Boninger; Brad E Dicianno; Rory A Cooper; Jeffrey D Towers; Alicia M Koontz; Aaron L Souza Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Kati S Karinharju; Alexandra M Boughey; Sean M Tweedy; Kelly M Clanchy; Stewart G Trost; Sjaan R Gomersall Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Alicia M Koontz; Lynn A Worobey; Ian M Rice; Jennifer L Collinger; Michael L Boninger Journal: J Appl Biomech Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 1.833
Authors: Alyssa J Schnorenberg; Brooke A Slavens; Mei Wang; Lawrence C Vogel; Peter A Smith; Gerald F Harris Journal: J Biomech Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Riemer J K Vegter; Claudine J Lamoth; Sonja de Groot; Dirkjan H E J Veeger; Lucas H V van der Woude Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 4.262