Literature DB >> 9649080

Acoustical analysis and perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal prosthetic voice.

C J van As1, F J Hilgers, I M Verdonck-de Leeuw, F Koopmans-van Beinum.   

Abstract

Voice analysis was performed on 21 "standard" laryngectomized, male patients with a Provox voice prosthesis, along with an age- and sex-matched control group of 20 normal speakers, using acoustical analyses (MDVP and CSL, Kay Elemetrics Corp.), maximum phonation time measurements, and perceptual evaluations. Comparison between MDVP and CSL revealed that the latter was not useful for the analysis of laryngectomized prosthetic voices. In contrast, MDVP seems suitable for this purpose, and contains a large number of parameters that significantly differentiate between patient and control speakers, as did the perceptual ratings and the maximum phonation time. Fundamental frequency appeared to be comparable for patients and control speakers. A significant influence of stoma occlusion and age was found for some voice parameters. Factor analyses showed correlations between the different MDVP parameters and correlations between the MDVP parameters and the perceptual ratings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9649080     DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(98)80044-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  8 in total

1.  Listener effort for highly intelligible tracheoesophageal speech.

Authors:  Kathy F Nagle; Tanya L Eadie
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Intelligibility of laryngectomees' substitute speech: automatic speech recognition and subjective rating.

Authors:  Maria Schuster; Tino Haderlein; Elmar Nöth; Jörg Lohscheller; Ulrich Eysholdt; Frank Rosanowski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Intensity and fundamental frequency control in tracheoesophageal voice.

Authors:  A Schindler; A Canale; A L Cavalot; R Albera; P Capaccio; F Ottaviani; O Schindler
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.124

4.  Voicing quantification is more relevant than period perturbation in substitution voices: an advanced acoustical study.

Authors:  P H Dejonckere; M B J Moerman; J P Martens; J Schoentgen; C Manfredi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Objective evaluation of the quality of substitution voices.

Authors:  Mieke Moerman; Glenn Pieters; Jean-Pierre Martens; Marie-Jeanne Van der Borgt; Phillippe Dejonckere
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Chaos Behavior Analysis of Alaryngeal Voices Including Esophageal (SE) and Tracheoesophageal (TE) Voices.

Authors:  Boquan Liu; Fan Zhang; Ling Chen; Matthew A Silverman; Hengxin Liu; Dehui Fu; Yongwang Huang; Jing Pan; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 1.391

7.  Comprehensive Evaluation of Vocal Outcomes and Quality of Life after Total Laryngectomy and Voice Restoration with J-Flap and Tracheoesophageal Puncture.

Authors:  Chung-Kan Tsao; Filippo Marchi; Chung-Jan Kang; Claudio Sampieri; Yi-An Lu; Shiang-Fu Huang; Yu-Ting Chen; Giorgio Giordano; Giorgio Peretti; Giampiero Parrinello; Andrea Iandelli; Tuan-Jen Fang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Using Beatboxing for Creative Rehabilitation After Laryngectomy: Experiences From a Public Engagement Project.

Authors:  Thomas Moors; Sanjeev Silva; Donatella Maraschin; David Young; John M Quinn; John de Carpentier; Johan Allouche; Evangelos Himonides
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.