Literature DB >> 16482982

Intensity and fundamental frequency control in tracheoesophageal voice.

A Schindler1, A Canale, A L Cavalot, R Albera, P Capaccio, F Ottaviani, O Schindler.   

Abstract

Tracheo-oesophageal voice prostheses are currently widely used following total laryngectomy. Data on maximum phonation time and spectrum have been studied by various Authors and are well known. On the contrary, intensity and fundamental frequency control have received little attention. Intensity and fundamental frequency play an important role in the prosodic aspects of speech. Fundamental frequency variations have been studied in tone language speakers, but the ability to voluntarily change intensity and fundamental frequency remain to be fully investigated. Aim of the present study was to analyse the ability of tracheo-oesophageal voice users to change intensity and fundamental frequency. A total of 12 male subjects who underwent total laryngectomy, in whom a tracheo-oesophageal prosthesis had been inserted, were considered. Maximum phonation time was calculated. Each subject was asked to utter an /a/ as loud as possible and an /a/ as soft as possible. Each subject was then asked to utter an /a/ at comfortable pitch and then at an interval of a fifth. Intensity as well as fundamental frequency variations were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Correlation between maximum phonation time and variation in intensity and in fundamental frequency as well as between the two latter variables was calculated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Mean maximum phonation time was 8 (+/- 3.8) sec. Mean energy was 50 (+/- 4.8) dB SPL for soft phonation and 68 (+/- 4.7) dB SPL for loud phonation. The difference observed was statistically significant (p < 0.02). Mean fundamental frequency values were 106 (+/- 14) Hz and 135 (+/- 34) Hz at the interval of a fifth. The difference observed was statistically significant (p < 0.02). Tracheo-oesophageal voice users were able to change intensity and fundamental frequency, but their control was rather poor. Variations in intensity, as well as fundamental frequency, did not show any correlation with maximum phonation time, and were not correlated with each other. In conclusion, the tracheo-oesophageal voice allows small fundamental frequency variations, but their control appears difficult. On the contrary, intensity variations appear larger and control somewhat easier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16482982      PMCID: PMC2639883     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital        ISSN: 0392-100X            Impact factor:   2.124


  14 in total

1.  Effects of sound pressure levels on fundamental frequency in tracheoesophageal speakers.

Authors:  D G Deschler; E T Doherty; C G Reed; M I Singer
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel duration characteristics related to perception of Cantonese alaryngeal speech.

Authors:  M L Ng; H R Gilbert; J W Lerman
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.849

3.  Spectrographic differences between tracheal-esophageal and esophageal voice.

Authors:  G Bertino; A Bellomo; C Miani; F Ferrero; A Staffieri
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 0.849

Review 4.  Speech outcomes after laryngeal cancer management.

Authors:  C B Simpson; G N Postma; R E Stone; R H Ossoff
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Comparison of phoniatric parameters in oesophageal and voice prosthetic speech.

Authors:  L P Löbe; V Gall; E M Pfau
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  1987

6.  Acoustic analysis of tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech.

Authors:  F Debruyne; P Delaere; J Wouters; P Uwents
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  Mechanism of tracheoesophageal shunt phonation.

Authors:  K Omori; H Kojima; M Nonomura; H Fukushima
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-06

8.  Vocal capacities in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.

Authors:  L Max; W Steurs; W de Bruyn
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Assessment of tracheoesophageal speech in a tonal language. A prospective study.

Authors:  S H Wong; C C Cheung; A P Yuen; W K Ho; W I Wei
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-01

10.  Acoustical analysis and perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal prosthetic voice.

Authors:  C J van As; F J Hilgers; I M Verdonck-de Leeuw; F Koopmans-van Beinum
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  2 in total

1.  3D simulation of an audible ultrasonic electrolarynx using difference waves.

Authors:  Patrick Mills; Jason Zara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The relationship between biomechanics of pharyngoesophageal segment and tracheoesophageal phonation.

Authors:  Teng Zhang; Ian Cook; Michał Szczęśniak; Julia Maclean; Peter Wu; Duong Duy Nguyen; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.