Literature DB >> 9648764

Evaluation of needle size for breast biopsy: comparison of 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge biopsy needles.

T H Helbich1, M Rudas, A Haitel, P D Kohlberger, M Thurnher, M Gnant, P Wunderbaldinger, G Wolf, G H Mostbeck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare the quantity and quality of tissue harvested from breast biopsy when using 14-, 16-, and 18-gauge "long-throw" needles. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized study in 64 patients with 66 breast lesions. Under stereotactic guidance, passes were made in random order with each of the three biopsy needles in each lesion. Samples were measured for tissue area and scored for their quality. All lesions, including benign and malignant lesions and lesions with and without microcalcifications, were analyzed. Findings of the biopsy samples were compared with the final diagnoses made at surgical excision.
RESULTS: In all 66 lesions, 14-gauge biopsy needles obtained significantly larger specimens (14-gauge, 13.14 mm2; 16-gauge, 9.6 mm2; 18-gauge, 6.41 mm2; p < .05) and scored significantly better (14-gauge, 8.37; 16-gauge, 7.56; 18-gauge, 7.14; p < .016) than either of the smaller needles. The results for malignant and benign lesions and for lesions with and without microcalcifications were similar but not equal to the overall results. However, benign lesions and areas with microcalcifications seem to be more problematic for both smaller needles than for 14-gauge needles.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the quantity and quality of breast biopsy specimens depend on the needle size. Of the three needle sizes tested, only 14-gauge long-throw biopsy needles can be recommended for breast biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9648764     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.171.1.9648764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

Review 1.  Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  T H Helbich; W Matzek; M H Fuchsjäger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy.

Authors:  G Schueller; C Schueller-Weidekamm; T H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Comparison of the accuracy of US-guided biopsy of breast masses performed with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge automated cutting needle biopsy devices, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Monica L Huang; Kenneth Hess; Rosalind P Candelaria; Mohammad Eghtedari; Beatriz E Adrada; Nour Sneige; Bruno D Fornage
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Effect of needle size on cancer detection, pain, bleeding and infection in TRUS-guided prostate biopsies: A prospective trial.

Authors:  Michael McCormack; Alain Duclos; Mathieu Latour; Marie Hélène McCormack; Daniel Liberman; Orchidee Djahangirian; Josette Bergeron; Luc Valiquette; Kevin Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Electroporation-based proteome sampling ex vivo enables the detection of brain melanoma protein signatures in a location proximate to visible tumor margins.

Authors:  Ilai Genish; Batel Gabay; Angela Ruban; Yona Goldshmit; Amrita Singh; Julia Wise; Klimentiy Levkov; Avshalom Shalom; Edward Vitkin; Zohar Yakhini; Alexander Golberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Does needle calibre affect pain and complication rates in patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy? A prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Giovanni Saredi; Saredi Giovanni; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Francesco Fidanza; Fidanza Francesco; Stefano De Stefani; De Stefani Stefano; Salvatore Micali; Micali Salvatore; Paterlini Maurizio; Maurizio Paterlini; Roberto D'Amico; Giampaolo Bianchi; Bianchi Giampaolo
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  A single lysis solution for the analysis of tissue samples by different proteomic technologies.

Authors:  Pavel Gromov; Julio E Celis; Irina Gromova; Fritz Rank; Vera Timmermans-Wielenga; José M A Moreira
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 9.  Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures.

Authors:  Matthew Wallis; Anne Tardivon; Anne Tarvidon; Thomas Helbich; Ingrid Schreer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.034

10.  Accuracy of 16/18G core needle biopsy for ultrasound-visible breast lesions.

Authors:  Jie-Ying Zhou; Jie Tang; Zhi-Li Wang; Fa-Qin Lv; Yu-Kun Luo; Hong-Zhen Qin; Mei Liu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.754

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.