Literature DB >> 9647594

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: assessment of variability in pathologic interpretations.

Z M Younossi1, T Gramlich, Y C Liu, C Matteoni, M Petrelli, J Goldblum, L Rybicki, A J McCullough.   

Abstract

The exact cause, prevalence, and rate of progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are unclear because of a lack of agreement on the pathologic features associated with the different types of NAFLD, their clinical syndromes, and because of a lack of accuracy in the interpretation of these pathologic features. Studies of NAFLD would be aided by a consistent and standardized approach to the interpretation of pathologic features. The aim of our study was to assess interobserver and intraobserver variation in the histologic abnormalities associated with NAFLD. We identified histologic features of NAFLD as reported in the literature, and we identified patients with the diagnosis of NAFLD through the databases of two large institutions. Histologic parameters were evaluated for each liver biopsy specimen by four hepatopathologists and twice by two of the four pathologists (blindly). Interobserver and intraobserver concordance among the pathologists was measured by kappa statistics. Nineteen histologic parameters compartmentalized into steatosis, inflammation, liver cell injury, and fibrosis were evaluated on 53 liver biopsy specimens. Significant, substantial, or moderate concordance was present in only six items: the extent of steatosis, sinusoidal location of fibrosis, perivenular fibrosis, grade of fibrosis, ballooning degeneration, and the presence of vacuolated nuclei. Substantial or moderate concordance also was seen for interobserver readings for location of steatosis and periportal injury. Parameters of inflammation were not scored as reliably as parameters of fibrosis and cell injury. We conclude that only some histologic features previously reported in NAFLD (especially those with substantial and moderate concordance for both interobserver and intraobserver interpretation) are interpreted uniformly by experienced pathologists. These histologic features might prove useful for the development of a standardized and reliable pathologic scoring system that includes the full histologic spectrum of NAFLD and its various clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9647594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  82 in total

1.  Digital quantification is more precise than traditional semiquantitation of hepatic steatosis: correlation with fibrosis in 220 treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Sekou R Rawlins; Ola El-Zammar; J Michael Zinkievich; Nancy Newman; Robert A Levine
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  A biomarker panel for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and NASH-related fibrosis.

Authors:  Zobair M Younossi; Sandra Page; Nila Rafiq; Aybike Birerdinc; Maria Stepanova; Noreen Hossain; Arian Afendy; Zahra Younoszai; Zachary Goodman; Ancha Baranova
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Histopathology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Brunt; Dina G Tiniakos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Generalizability of the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network histologic scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Ravi Juluri; Raj Vuppalanchi; John Olson; Aynur Unalp; Mark L Van Natta; Oscar W Cummings; James Tonascia; Naga Chalasani
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Frozen section diagnosis in donor liver biopsies: observer variation of semiquantitative and quantitative steatosis assessment.

Authors:  Stefan Biesterfeld; Jasmin Knapp; Fernando Bittinger; Heiko Götte; Martin Schramm; Gerd Otto
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Clinical, laboratory and histological associations in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Jeanne M Clark; Nathan M Bass; Mark L Van Natta; Aynur Unalp-Arida; James Tonascia; Claudia O Zein; Elizabeth M Brunt; David E Kleiner; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal; Anna Mae Diehl; Joel E Lavine; Naga Chalasani; Kris V Kowdley
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Hepatocyte-specific deletion of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) protects against diet-induced steatohepatitis and glucose intolerance.

Authors:  Sally Yu Shi; Rubén García Martin; Robin E Duncan; Diana Choi; Shun-Yan Lu; Stephanie A Schroer; Erica P Cai; Cynthia T Luk; Kathryn E Hopperton; Anthony F Domenichiello; Christine Tang; Mark Naples; Mark J Dekker; Adria Giacca; Khosrow Adeli; Kay-Uwe Wagner; Richard P Bazinet; Minna Woo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Sonographic assessment of fatty liver: intraobserver and interobserver variability.

Authors:  Mustafa Cengiz; Senem Sentürk; Bulent Cetin; Aylin Hasanefendioğlu Bayrak; Senem Uysal Bilek
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

9.  Assessment of liver fat in an obese patient population using noncontrast CT fat percent index.

Authors:  Ali F Jon; Ahmad R Cheema; Atif N Khan; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Thomas Hauser; Imad Nasser; Francine K Welty; Andrew Karellas; Melvin E Clouse
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.605

10.  Influence of liver biopsy heterogeneity and diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in subjects undergoing gastric bypass.

Authors:  Janani Arun; Niraj Jhala; Audrey J Lazenby; Ronald Clements; Gary A Abrams
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.