Literature DB >> 9640153

Appropriate size and inflation of the laryngeal mask airway.

T Asai1, T K Howell, K Koga, S Morris.   

Abstract

We have compared size 3 and size 4 laryngeal masks in 30 females and size 4 and size 5 in 30 males for success rate of insertion, incidence of airleak and pressure exerted on the pharynx. First, the ex vivo volume-pressure relationship of the mask was obtained. Second, after insertion of a mask, the cuff was inflated with the recommended maximum volume of air and intracuff pressure measured. Third, the incidence of airleak during a steady airway pressure of 18 cm H2O was noted. Fourth, the cuff was deflated until it just prevented airleak, and cuff pressure was measured. The mask was removed, the other size was inserted and the same procedure repeated. At the end of operation, final in vivo and ex vivo pressures were measured. The pressure exerted on the pharynx was calculated as the difference between ex vivo and in vivo intracuff pressures. It was always possible to insert both sizes in both sexes. In females, airleak occurred in 15 patients with the size 3 and in five patients with the size 4 (difference: P = 0.005) and in males, 21 patients with the size 4 and in four patients with the size 5 (P < 0.001). Removal of air to the minimum effective volume significantly decreased intracuff pressure and pressure on the pharynx; on removal of the mask, pressures were similar to, or lower than, initial pressures. Therefore, a larger mask (size 4 in females and size 5 in males) provided a better seal than a smaller size without producing higher pressures on the pharynx.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9640153     DOI: 10.1093/bja/80.4.470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Laryngeal masks. Possibilities and limits].

Authors:  H Hillebrand; J Motsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  The air-Q(®) intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-ProSeal(TM) : a prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure.

Authors:  R E Galgon; K M Schroeder; S Han; A Andrei; A M Joffe
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Tight bag.

Authors:  S Parthasarathy; M Ravishankar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-05

4.  Comparison of the size 3 and size 4 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, non-paralyzed women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mi-Hyun Kim; Jung-Won Hwang; Eun-Sung Kim; Sung-Hee Han; Young-Tae Jeon; Sun-Mi Lee
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  [Continuous cuff pressure measurement during laryngeal mask anesthesia : An obligatory measure to avoid postoperative complications].

Authors:  M Hensel; T Güldenpfennig; A Schmidt; M Krumm
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Low flow anesthesia: Efficacy and outcome of laryngeal mask airway versus pressure-optimized cuffed-endotracheal tube.

Authors:  Zeinab A El-Seify; Ahmed Metwally Khattab; Ashraf Shaaban; Dobrila Radojevic; Ivanka Jankovic
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2010-01

7.  Randomised Comparison of the AMBU AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask and the LMA Unique Laryngeal Mask Airway in Spontaneously Breathing Adults.

Authors:  Daryl Lindsay Williams; James M Zeng; Karl D Alexander; David T Andrews
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-29

8.  Comparison of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size 2 and 2½ in anesthetized and paralyzed pediatric patients with same weight group: A prospective randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Reena Mahajan; Susheela Taxak
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec

9.  Randomized Comparison of Actual and Ideal Body Weight for Size Selection of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic in Overweight Patients.

Authors:  Min-Soo Kim; Jong Seok Lee; Sang Beom Nam; Hyo Jong Kang; Ji Eun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Application of Minimum Effective Cuff Inflating Volume for Laryngeal Mask Airway and its Impact on Postoperative Pharyngeal Complications.

Authors:  Bing-Bing Li; Jie Yan; Hong-Gang Zhou; Jing Hao; Ai-Jia Liu; Zheng-Liang Ma
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.