Literature DB >> 25249429

Comparison of the size 3 and size 4 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, non-paralyzed women: a randomized controlled trial.

Mi-Hyun Kim1, Jung-Won Hwang, Eun-Sung Kim, Sung-Hee Han, Young-Tae Jeon, Sun-Mi Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Based on experimental results, various authors have advocated a size 4 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in preference to a size 3 PLMA for women given a neuromuscular blocking agent because the larger size provided a better airway seal. However, spontaneously breathing patients may be ventilated adequately with a lower seal pressure than that needed for mechanical ventilation. Therefore, a smaller size might be preferable as its reduced bulk possibly induces less mucosal damage in non-paralyzed patients.
METHODS: A total of 152 females undergoing general anesthesia for short outpatient gynecological surgeries were randomly allocated in equal numbers to insertion of a size 3 or 4 PLMA. The insertion time, success rate, seal pressure, hemodynamic variables, and complications, such as blood staining and sore throat, were evaluated.
RESULTS: The incidence of blood staining was lower with the size 3 PLMA compared to the size 4 PLMA (18 vs. 36 %; P = 0.028). Compared with the size 3 LMA, the size 4 PLMA resulted in higher fluctuations in both blood pressure (P = 0.003) and heart rate (P = 0.01). The insertion time was shorter with the size 3 PLMA (9 vs. 16 s; P < 0.001). The airway seal pressure with the size 3 PLMA, although lower than that of the size 4 PLMA (23 vs. 28 cmH2O; P = 0.001), was sufficient for spontaneous ventilation.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to the reduced incidence of mucosal injury and greater hemodynamic stability, the size 3 PLMA may be preferable to the size 4 PLMA for non-paralyzed females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25249429     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-014-1916-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  36 in total

Review 1.  Review article: cuff volume and size selection with the laryngeal mask.

Authors:  T Asai; J Brimacombe
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  The LMA 'ProSeal'--a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent.

Authors:  A I Brain; C Verghese; P J Strube
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  A randomized controlled trial comparing the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with the Laryngeal Tube Suction in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Luis A Gaitini; Sonia J Vaida; Mostafa Somri; Boris Yanovski; Bruce Ben-David; Carin A Hagberg
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Comparison of two insertion techniques of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: standard versus 90-degree rotation.

Authors:  Jung-won Hwang; Hee-Pyoung Park; Young-Jin Lim; Sang-Hwan Do; Sang-Chul Lee; Young-Tae Jeon
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  The use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in caesarean section--experience in 3000 cases.

Authors:  B K Halaseh; Z F Sukkar; L Haj Hassan; A T H Sia; W A Bushnaq; H Adarbeh
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.669

6.  Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation.

Authors:  J Brimacomb; C Keller; S Kurian; J Myles
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Sex-based ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size selection: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized, paralyzed male and female adult patients.

Authors:  Shinichi Kihara; Joseph Brimacombe
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the 90 degrees rotation technique.

Authors:  Young-Tae Jeon; Hyo Seok Na; Sang-Hyun Park; Ah-Young Oh; Hee-Pyoung Park; Mi-Ja Yun; Jin Hee Kim; Jung-Won Hwang
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 2114 adult patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  Kai Goldmann; Carolin Hechtfischer; Amena Malik; Andrea Kussin; Christian Freisburger
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Analysis of 1000 consecutive uses of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway by one anaesthetist at a district general hospital.

Authors:  T M Cook; B Gibbison
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 9.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.