Literature DB >> 9639606

Pediatric liver transplantation: from the full-size liver graft to reduced, split, and living related liver transplantation.

J B Otte1, J de Ville de Goyet, R Reding, L Van Obbergh, F Veyckemans, M A Carlier, M De Kock, S Clement de Clety, P Clapuyt, E Sokal, J Lerut, I Delbeke, V Dierick, M Janssen, R Rosati, F Libert.   

Abstract

Between 1984 and 1996, the authors performed 499 liver transplants in 416 children less than 15 years old. The overall patient survival at 10 years was 76.5%. It was 71.3% for the 209 children grafted in 1984-1990; 78.5% for biliary atresia (n = 286), 87.3% for metabolic diseases (n = 59), and 72.7% for acute liver failure (n = 22). The 5-year survival was 73.6% for the 209 children grafted in 1984-1990 and 85% for the 206 grafted in 1991-1996. Scarcity of size-matched donors led to the development of innovative techniques: 174 children who electively received a reduced liver as a first graft in our center had a 5-year survival of 76% while 168 who received a full-size graft had a survival of 85% (NS). Results of the European Split Liver Registry showed 6-month graft survival similar to results obtained with full-size grafts collected by the European Liver Transplant Registry. Extensive use of these techniques allowed the mortality while waiting to be reduced from 16.5% in 1984-1990 to 10% in 1991-1992. It rose again to 17% in 1993, leading the authors to develop a program of living related liver transplantation (LRLT). The legal and ethical aspects are analyzed. Between July 1993 and October 1997, the authors performed 53 LRLTs with 90% survival. In elective cases, a detailed analysis was made of the 45 children listed for LRLT between July 1993 and March 1997 and the 79 registered on the cadaveric waiting list during the same period. Mortality while waiting was 2% and 14.5% for the LRLT and cadaveric lists, respectively. The retransplantation rate was 4.6% and 16.1% for LRLT and cadaveric transplants, respectively. Overall post-transplant survival was 88% and 82% for children who received a LRLT or a cadaveric graft, respectively. Overall survival from the date of registration was 86% and 70% (P < 0.05) for LRLT or cadaveric LT respectively. The 2-year post-transplant survival in children less than 1 year of age at transplantation was 88.8% and 80. 3% with a LRLT or cadaveric graft, respectively; patient survival after 3 months post-transplant was 95.8% and 91.9% for stable children waiting at home, 93.7% and 93.7% in children hospitalized for complications of their disease, and 89.5% and 77.7% for children hospitalized in an intensive care unit at the time of transplantation for children who received a LRLT or cadaveric graft, respectively. It is concluded that LRLT seems to be justified for multidisciplinary teams having a large experience with reduced and split liver grafting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9639606     DOI: 10.1007/s003830050328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  15 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Debora Kogan-Liberman; Sukru Emre; Benjamin L Shneider
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-02

2.  Surgical technique for right lobe adult living donor liver transplantation without venovenous bypass or portocaval shunting and with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction.

Authors:  H P Grewal; M H Shokouh-Amiri; S Vera; R Stratta; W Bagous; A O Gaber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Access to pediatric liver transplantation: does regional variation play a role?

Authors:  Mary T Austin; Irene D Feurer; C Wright Pinson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Predictors of survival following liver transplantation in infants: a single-center analysis of more than 200 cases.

Authors:  Robert S Venick; Douglas G Farmer; Sue V McDiarmid; John P Duffy; Sherilyn A Gordon; Hasan Yersiz; Johnny C Hong; Jorge H Vargas; Marvin E Ament; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Living related liver transplantation: medical and social aspects of a controversial therapy.

Authors:  C E Broelsch; G Testa; A Alexandrou; M Malagó
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  One hundred nine living donor liver transplants in adults and children: a single-center experience.

Authors:  C M Miller; G E Gondolesi; S Florman; C Matsumoto; L Muñoz; T Yoshizumi; T Artis; T M Fishbein; P A Sheiner; L Kim-Schluger; T Schiano; B L Shneider; S Emre; M E Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Results of split liver transplantation in children.

Authors:  Rahul R Deshpande; Matthew J Bowles; Hector Vilca-Melendez; Parthi Srinivasan; Raffaele Girlanda; Anil Dhawan; Giorgina Mieli-Vergani; Paolo Muiesan; Nigel D Heaton; Mohamed Rela
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Liver transplantation().

Authors:  M Rossi; G Mennini; Q Lai; S Ginanni Corradini; F M Drudi; F Pugliese; P B Berloco
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2007-04-16

9.  Impact of surgical and immunological parameters in pediatric liver transplantation: a multivariate analysis in 500 consecutive recipients of primary grafts.

Authors:  Veerle Evrard; Jean-Bernard Otte; Etienne Sokal; Jean-Stéphan Rochet; Fabian Haccourt; Fabrizio Gennari; Dominique Latinne; Jacques Jamart; Raymond Reding
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Sequential Treatment of Biliary Atresia With Kasai Hepatoportoenterostomy and Liver Transplantation: Benefits, Risks, and Outcome in 393 Children.

Authors:  Roberto Tambucci; Catherine de Magnée; Margot Szabo; Aniss Channaoui; Aurore Pire; Vanessa de Meester de Betzenbroeck; Isabelle Scheers; Xavier Stephenne; Françoise Smets; Etienne M Sokal; Raymond Reding
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.