Literature DB >> 14745337

Impact of surgical and immunological parameters in pediatric liver transplantation: a multivariate analysis in 500 consecutive recipients of primary grafts.

Veerle Evrard1, Jean-Bernard Otte, Etienne Sokal, Jean-Stéphan Rochet, Fabian Haccourt, Fabrizio Gennari, Dominique Latinne, Jacques Jamart, Raymond Reding.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the respective impact of surgical and immunologic factors on patient/graft outcome and rejection after pediatric liver transplantation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) constitutes a validated therapeutic modality for acute liver failure and end-stage liver disease in children. Only a few large studies of factors influencing outcome of pediatric OLT are available in the literature. Studies considering the impact of rejection on graft outcome are scarce in adult OLT and are not even available for pediatric recipients.
METHODS: Five hundred consecutive pediatric recipients (<15 years) of a primary OLT performed between March 1984 and July 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. The main indication was biliary atresia (n = 328). A living related donor graft was used from July 1993 onwards in 82 children (16%). Survival was calculated and multivariate analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Actuarial survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 85%, 81%, and 79% for patients, and 76%, 71%, and 70% for grafts, respectively. At the multivariate analysis, only 3 factors were found to be independently correlated with better patient survival: year of transplantation (P = 0.001), pretransplant diagnosis (P < 0.001, worst results for liver tumors), and ABO matching (P < 0.001, worst results for ABO incompatibility). Similarly, 3 factors were independently correlated with better rejection-free graft survival: tacrolimus as primary immunosuppressant (P < 0.001), a negative T-cell crossmatch (P = 0.016), and younger age of the donor (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric OLT constitutes a complex undertaking with multifactorial impact on results: (1). a strong learning curve effect was shown to impact on overall results; (2). pediatric liver tumors still represent a challenging indication for OLT; (3). primary immunoprophylaxis with tacrolimus provided a lower rejection incidence; (4). the younger donor age effect deserves further immunologic investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14745337      PMCID: PMC1356222          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000108681.24374.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  23 in total

1.  Microchimerism, macrochimerism, and tolerance.

Authors:  T E Starzl; N Murase
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  The pediatric liver transplant program at the Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Saint-Luc, Brussels: overall results in 444 children (1984-1997).

Authors:  R Reding; F Gennari; M Janssen; J Jamart; J de Ville de Goyet; J Lerut; E Sokal; J B Otte
Journal:  Acta Gastroenterol Belg       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Liver replacement for pediatric patients.

Authors:  T E Starzl; L J Koep; G P Schröter; C G Halgrimson; K A Porter; R Weil
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Biopsy findings in cases of rejection of liver allograft.

Authors:  S G Hubscher; D Clements; E Elias; P McMaster
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Management of the pediatric liver transplant patient.

Authors:  S V McDiarmid
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  Histocompatibility and liver transplant outcome. Does HLA exert a dualistic effect?

Authors:  B H Markus; R J Duquesnoy; R D Gordon; J J Fung; M Vanek; G Klintmalm; C Bryan; D Van Thiel; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Liver transplantation in children less than 1 year of age.

Authors:  E M Sokal; F Veyckemans; J de Ville de Goyet; D Moulin; N Van Hoorebeeck; D Alberti; J P Buts; J Rahier; L Van Obbergh; P Clapuyt
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT): year 2000 outcomes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Improved graft survival of pediatric liver recipients transplanted with pediatric-aged liver donors.

Authors:  S V McDiarmid; D B Davies; E B Edwards
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Pediatric liver transplantation with cadaveric or living related donors: comparative results in 90 elective recipients of primary grafts.

Authors:  R Reding; J de V de Goyet; I Delbeke; E Sokal; J Jamart; M Janssen; J B Otte
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sequential Treatment of Biliary Atresia With Kasai Hepatoportoenterostomy and Liver Transplantation: Benefits, Risks, and Outcome in 393 Children.

Authors:  Roberto Tambucci; Catherine de Magnée; Margot Szabo; Aniss Channaoui; Aurore Pire; Vanessa de Meester de Betzenbroeck; Isabelle Scheers; Xavier Stephenne; Françoise Smets; Etienne M Sokal; Raymond Reding
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.418

2.  Predicting early outcomes of liver transplantation in young children: The EARLY study.

Authors:  Rashid Alobaidi; Natalie Anton; Dominic Cave; Elham Khodayari Moez; Ari R Joffe
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2018-01-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.