Literature DB >> 11524583

One hundred nine living donor liver transplants in adults and children: a single-center experience.

C M Miller1, G E Gondolesi, S Florman, C Matsumoto, L Muñoz, T Yoshizumi, T Artis, T M Fishbein, P A Sheiner, L Kim-Schluger, T Schiano, B L Shneider, S Emre, M E Schwartz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the evolution of a living donor liver transplant program and the authors' experience with 109 cases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The authors' institution began to offer living donor liver transplants to children in 1993 and to adults in 1998.
METHODS: Donors were healthy, ages 18 to 60 years, related or unrelated, and ABO-compatible (except in one case). Donor evaluation was thorough. Liver biopsy was performed for abnormal lipid profiles or a history of significant alcohol use, a body mass index more than 28, or suspected steatosis. Imaging studies included angiography, computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Recipient evaluation and management were the same as for cadaveric transplant.
RESULTS: After ABO screening, 136 potential donors were evaluated for 113 recipients; 23 donors withdrew for medical or personal reasons. Four donor surgeries were aborted; 109 transplants were performed. Fifty children (18 years or younger) received 47 left lateral segments and 3 left lobes; 59 adults received 50 right lobes and 9 left lobes. The average donor hospital stay was 6 days. Two donors each required one unit of banked blood. Right lobe donors had three bile leaks from the cut surface of the liver; all resolved. Another right lobe donor had prolonged hyperbilirubinemia. Three donors had small bowel obstructions; two required operation. All donors are alive and well. The most common indications for transplant were biliary atresia in children (56%) and hepatitis C in adults (40%); 35.6% of adults had hepatocellular carcinoma. Biliary reconstructions in all children and 44 adults were with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy; 15 adults had duct-to-duct anastomoses. The incidence of major vascular complications was 12% in children and 11.8% in adult recipients. Children had three bile leaks (6%) and six (12%) biliary strictures. Adult patients had 14 (23.7%) bile leaks and 4 (6.8%) biliary strictures. Patient and graft survival rates were 87.6% and 81%, respectively, at 1 year and 75.1% and 69.6% at 5 years. In children, patient and graft survival rates were 89.9% and 85.8%, respectively, at 1 year and 80.9% and 78% at 5 years. In adults, patient and graft survival rates were 85.6% and 77%, respectively, at 1 year.
CONCLUSION: Living donor liver transplantation has become an important option for our patients and has dramatically changed our approach to patients with liver failure. The donor surgery is safe and can be done with minimal complications. We expect that living donor liver transplants will represent more than 50% of our transplants within 3 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11524583      PMCID: PMC1422021          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200109000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  26 in total

1.  Initial experience with 40 cases of living-related donor liver transplantation at the University of Tokyo.

Authors:  Y Harihara; M Makuuchi; H Kawarasaki; T Takayama; K Kubota; M Ito; H Yoshino; M Hirata; Y Kita; K Kusaka; K Sano; M Ijichi; M Watanabe; K Hashizume; T Nakatsuka
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Whither living donor liver transplantation?

Authors:  R W Strong
Journal:  Liver Transpl Surg       Date:  1999-11

3.  Living donor liver transplantation: an 8-year experience with 379 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Y Inomata; K Tanaka; S Uemoto; K Asonuma; H Egawa; T Kiuchi; S Fujita; M Hayashi
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1999 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Cumulative experience with pediatric living related liver transplantation.

Authors:  P M Colombani; H Lau; K Prabhakaran; W Maley; B Wise; K Schwarz; A Klein
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Living-related liver transplantation for patients with fulminant and subfulminant hepatic failure.

Authors:  S Miwa; Y Hashikura; A Mita; T Kubota; H Chisuwa; Y Nakazawa; T Ikegami; M Terada; S Miyagawa; S Kawasaki
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Minimum graft size for successful living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  C M Lo; S T Fan; C L Liu; J K Chan; B K Lam; G K Lau; W I Wei; J Wong
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-10-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Impact of segmental grafts on pediatric liver transplantation--a review of the United Network for Organ Sharing Scientific Registry data (1990-1996).

Authors:  R Sindhi; J Rosendale; D Mundy; S Taranto; P Baliga; A Reuben; P R Rajagopalan; A Hebra; E Tagge; H B Othersen
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Right lobe living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  A Marcos; R A Fisher; J M Ham; M L Shiffman; A J Sanyal; V A Luketic; R K Sterling; M P Posner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-09-27       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Pediatric liver transplantation with cadaveric or living related donors: comparative results in 90 elective recipients of primary grafts.

Authors:  R Reding; J de V de Goyet; I Delbeke; E Sokal; J Jamart; M Janssen; J B Otte
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 10.  Pediatric liver transplantation: from the full-size liver graft to reduced, split, and living related liver transplantation.

Authors:  J B Otte; J de Ville de Goyet; R Reding; L Van Obbergh; F Veyckemans; M A Carlier; M De Kock; S Clement de Clety; P Clapuyt; E Sokal; J Lerut; I Delbeke; V Dierick; M Janssen; R Rosati; F Libert
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.827

View more
  46 in total

1.  Can current technology be integrated to facilitate laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy?

Authors:  E Lin; R Gonzalez; K R Venkatesh; S G Mattar; S P Bowers; K M Fugate; T G Heffron; C D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Evaluation of potential liver living donors. Logistic and financial aspects].

Authors:  D C Broering; P Bok; L Fischer; M Sterneck; X Rogiers
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Copper metabolism after living related liver transplantation for Wilson's disease.

Authors:  Xue-Hao Wang; Feng Cheng; Feng Zhang; Xiang-Cheng Li; Jian-Ming Qian; Lian-Bao Kong; Hao Zhang; Guo-Qiang Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Split-liver transplantation in the United States: outcomes of a national survey.

Authors:  John F Renz; Jean C Emond; Hasan Yersiz; Nancy L Ascher; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Computer-assisted operative planning in adult living donor liver transplantation: a new way to resolve the dilemma of the middle hepatic vein.

Authors:  A Radtke; S Nadalin; G C Sotiropoulos; E P Molmenti; T Schroeder; C Valentin-Gamazo; H Lang; M Bockhorn; H O Peitgen; C E Broelsch; M Malagó
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Prospective intraindividual comparison between respiratory-triggered balanced steady-state free precession and breath-hold gradient-echo and time-of-flight magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of portal and hepatic veins.

Authors:  Jürgen K Willmann; Kerstin Göpfert; Amelie M Lutz; Daniel Nanz; Lucas McCormack; Henrik Petrowsky; Burkhardt Seifert; Patrice Hervo; Borut Marincek; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Improvement in survival associated with adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Carl L Berg; Brenda W Gillespie; Robert M Merion; Robert S Brown; Michael M Abecassis; James F Trotter; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; R Mark Ghobrial; Abraham Shaked; Jeffrey H Fair; James E Everhart
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Evaluation of diffuse liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: which modality is best?

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; Daryl M Chen; Richard S Breiman; Antonio C Westphalen; Benjamin M Yeh; Kirk D Jones; Ying Lu; Fergus V Coakley; Peter W Callen
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 9.  Ethical issues in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Mark W Russo; Robert S Brown
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-02

Review 10.  [Living donor liver transplantation].

Authors:  C E Broelsch; M Malago; A Frilling; S Nadalin; E Malamutmann; C Klein; G Gerken
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.