Literature DB >> 9636110

Single olivocochlear neurons in the guinea pig. II. Response plasticity due to noise conditioning.

M C Brown1, S G Kujawa, M C Liberman.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that daily, moderate-level sound exposure, or conditioning, can reduce injury from a subsequent high-level noise exposure. We tested the hypothesis that this conditioning produces an increased activity in the olivocochlear efferent reflex, a reflex known to provide protection to the cochlea. Guinea pigs were conditioned by a 10-day intermittent exposure to 2-4 kHz noise at 85 dB sound pressure level. This conditioning is known to reduce damage from a subsequent high-level exposure to the same noise band. Responses to monaural and binaural sound were recorded from single medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent neurons, and data from conditioned animals were compared with those obtained from unexposed controls. MOC neurons were classified by their response to noise bursts in the ipsilateral or contralateral ears as ipsi units, contra units, or either-ear units. There were no significant differences in the distributions of these unit types between control and conditioned animals. There were also no differences in other responses to monaural stimuli, including the distribution of characteristic frequencies (CFs), the sharpness of tuning, or thresholds at the CF. For binaural sound at high levels, particularly relevant to sound-evoked activation of the MOC reflex during acoustic overstimulation, the firing rates of MOC neurons with CFs just above the conditioning band showed slight (but statistically significant) elevations relative to control animals. Frequency regions just above the conditioning band also demonstrated maximum conditioning-related protection; thus protection could be due, in part, to long-term changes in MOC discharge rates. For binaural sound at low levels, MOC firing rates in conditioned animals also were increased significantly relative to controls. Again, increases were largest for neurons with CFs just above the conditioning band. For equivalent monaural sound, rates were not significantly increased; thus, conditioning appears to increase binaural facilitation by opposite-ear sound. These data indicate that MOC neurons show long-term plasticity in acoustic responsiveness that is dependent on their acoustic history.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9636110     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.6.3088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

1.  Influence of sound-conditioning on noise-induced susceptibility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Barden B Stagner; Glen K Martin; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Modulation of hair cell efferents.

Authors:  Eric Wersinger; Paul Albert Fuchs
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Medial olivocochlear reflex interneurons are located in the posteroventral cochlear nucleus: a kainic acid lesion study in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Ronald K de Venecia; M Charles Liberman; John J Guinan; M Christian Brown
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Prolonged low-level noise-induced plasticity in the peripheral and central auditory system of rats.

Authors:  Adam M Sheppard; Guang-Di Chen; Senthilvelan Manohar; Dalian Ding; Bo-Hua Hu; Wei Sun; Jiwei Zhao; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Attenuation of noise-induced hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus by pre-treatment with MK-801.

Authors:  M W Criddle; D A Godfrey; J A Kaltenbach
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Recent advancements in understanding the role of epigenetics in the auditory system.

Authors:  Rahul Mittal; Nicole Bencie; George Liu; Nicolas Eshraghi; Eric Nisenbaum; Susan H Blanton; Denise Yan; Jeenu Mittal; Christine T Dinh; Juan I Young; Feng Gong; Xue Zhong Liu
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Ultrastructure of spines and associated terminals on brainstem neurons controlling auditory input.

Authors:  M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee; Thane E Benson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission: measurements in humans and simulations with an active cochlear model.

Authors:  Yong-Sun Choi; Soo-Young Lee; Kourosh Parham; Stephen T Neely; Duck O Kim
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  The olivocochlear system and protection from acoustic trauma: a mini literature review.

Authors:  Adrian Fuente
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-22

Review 10.  Use of the guinea pig in studies on the development and prevention of acquired sensorineural hearing loss, with an emphasis on noise.

Authors:  Gaëlle Naert; Marie-Pierre Pasdelou; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.