Literature DB >> 9632791

Analysis of gene targeting and intrachromosomal homologous recombination stimulated by genomic double-strand breaks in mouse embryonic stem cells.

G Donoho1, M Jasin, P Berg.   

Abstract

To investigate the effects of in vivo genomic DNA double-strand breaks on the efficiency and mechanisms of gene targeting in mouse embryonic stem cells, we have used a series of insertion and replacement vectors carrying two, one, or no genomic sites for the rare-cutting endonuclease I-SceI. These vectors were introduced into the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (hprt) gene to produce substrates for gene-targeting (plasmid-to-chromosome) or intrachromosomal (direct repeat) homologous recombination. Recombination at the hprt locus is markedly increased following transfection with an I-SceI expression plasmid and a homologous donor plasmid (if needed). The frequency of gene targeting in clones with an I-SceI site attains a value of 1%, 5,000-fold higher than that in clones with no I-SceI site. The use of silent restriction site polymorphisms indicates that the frequencies with which donor plasmid sequences replace the target chromosomal sequences decrease with distance from the genomic break site. The frequency of intrachromosomal recombination reaches a value of 3.1%, 120-fold higher than background spontaneous recombination. Because palindromic insertions were used as polymorphic markers, a significant number of recombinants exhibit distinct genotypic sectoring among daughter cells from a single clone, suggesting the existence of heteroduplex DNA in the original recombination product.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9632791      PMCID: PMC108991          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.18.7.4070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  41 in total

1.  High frequency targeting of genes to specific sites in the mammalian genome.

Authors:  K R Thomas; K R Folger; M R Capecchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-02-14       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Recombination in mouse L cells between DNA introduced into cells and homologous chromosomal sequences.

Authors:  F L Lin; K Sperle; N Sternberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Postmeiotic segregation in Saccharomyces.

Authors:  M S Esposito
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1971

4.  Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process.

Authors:  F L Lin; K Sperle; N Sternberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  The double-strand-break repair model for recombination.

Authors:  J W Szostak; T L Orr-Weaver; R J Rothstein; F W Stahl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Homologous recombination between defective neo genes in mouse 3T6 cells.

Authors:  A J Smith; P Berg
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1984

7.  Homologous recombination with DNA introduced into mammalian cells.

Authors:  O Smithies; M A Koralewski; K Y Song; R S Kucherlapati
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1984

8.  Gene conversion tracts from double-strand break repair in mammalian cells.

Authors:  B Elliott; C Richardson; J Winderbaum; J A Nickoloff; M Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Germ-line transmission of genes introduced into cultured pluripotential cells by retroviral vector.

Authors:  E Robertson; A Bradley; M Kuehn; M Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Oct 2-8       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase genes of mouse and Chinese hamster: construction and sequence analysis of cDNA recombinants.

Authors:  D S Konecki; J Brennand; J C Fuscoe; C T Caskey; A C Chinault
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  79 in total

1.  A double-strand break in a chromosomal LINE element can be repaired by gene conversion with various endogenous LINE elements in mouse cells.

Authors:  A Tremblay; M Jasin; P Chartrand
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  The mechanism of mammalian gene replacement is consistent with the formation of long regions of heteroduplex DNA associated with two crossing-over events.

Authors:  J Li; L R Read; M D Baker
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Pre-selection of integration sites imparts repeatable transgene expression.

Authors:  H Wallace; R Ansell; J Clark; J McWhir
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells.

Authors:  A J Pierce; R D Johnson; L H Thompson; M Jasin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells.

Authors:  R D Johnson; M Jasin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-07-03       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

Authors:  A J Pierce; P Hu; M Han; N Ellis; M Jasin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Interchromosomal gene conversion at an endogenous human cell locus.

Authors:  P J Quintana; E A Neuwirth; A J Grosovsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Chromosome healing in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  C N Sprung; G E Reynolds; M Jasin; J P Murnane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Site-specific genomic integration in mammalian cells mediated by phage phiC31 integrase.

Authors:  B Thyagarajan; E C Olivares; R P Hollis; D S Ginsburg; M P Calos
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Testing predictions of the double-strand break repair model relating to crossing over in Mammalian cells.

Authors:  Erin C Birmingham; Shauna A Lee; Richard D McCulloch; Mark D Baker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.