Literature DB >> 9629106

Evidence-based guidelines for universal counselling and offering of HIV testing in pregnancy in Canada.

L Samson1, S King.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide Canadian health care workers with evidence-based guidelines for universal counselling about HIV testing and the offering of such testing to all pregnant women. OPTIONS: Universal counselling and offering of HIV testing to all pregnant women versus targeted testing of only pregnant women at high risk for HIV infection. Antiretroviral treatment protocols for HIV-positive mothers and their infants are discussed as the intervention to reduce mother-to-child transmission rates. OUTCOMES: Main outcomes are mother-to-child HIV transmission rates and consequences of HIV testing on the mother and infant. EVIDENCE: Articles published from January 1985 to March 1997 identified through a MEDLINE search; articles published in pertinent medical journals in 1996 and 1997 identified through a manual search; and abstracts presented at international HIV/AIDS conferences. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Early diagnosis of HIV infection in a pregnant woman optimizes her medical and psychosocial care, decreases the incidence of mother-to-child transmission and decreases the risk of horizontal transmission to sexual partners. New, third-generation HIV tests have reduced false-positive rates and thus diminished the harm of screening. RECOMMENDATIONS: A screening strategy consisting of universal counselling and offering of HIV testing is recommended for all pregnant women in Canada (grade B recommendation). Targeted testing of only pregnant women at high risk for HIV infection fails to identify a substantial proportion of HIV-positive pregnant women and is therefore not recommended (grade D recommendation). Women who identify themselves as being at high risk and whose initial HIV test result is negative should be counselled about the reduction of high-risk behaviours and retested in 6 months (grade B recommendation). Treatment of seropositive women and infants with zidovudine to prevent mother-to-child transmission is recommended (grade A or B recommendation depending on gestational age and CD4 count). VALIDATION: These guidelines are endorsed by the Canadian Pediatric AIDS Research Group and are in agreement with the recommendations of the Canadian Paediatric Society and the US Public Health Service Task Force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9629106      PMCID: PMC1229371     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  53 in total

1.  Voluntary HIV testing in the antenatal clinic: differing uptake rates for individual counselling midwives.

Authors:  J Meadows; S Jenkinson; J Catalan; B Gazzard
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  1990

2.  HIV-1 serologic test results for one million newborn dried-blood specimens: assay performance and implications for screening.

Authors:  M Gwinn; M A Redus; T C Granade; W H Hannon; J R George
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988)       Date:  1992

3.  Social acceptability of HIV screening among pregnant women.

Authors:  J P Moatti; C Le Gales; V Seror; E Papiernik; R Henrion
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  1990

4.  Targeted HIV screening at a Los Angeles prenatal/family planning health center.

Authors:  L J Fehrs; D Hill; P R Kerndt; T P Rose; C Henneman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Early detection of antibodies to HIV-1 by third-generation assays.

Authors:  H L Zaaijer; P v Exel-Oehlers; T Kraaijeveld; E Altena; P N Lelie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-09-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A controlled trial comparing continued zidovudine with didanosine in human immunodeficiency virus infection. The NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

Authors:  J O Kahn; S W Lagakos; D D Richman; A Cross; C Pettinelli; S H Liou; M Brown; P A Volberding; C S Crumpacker; G Beall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Determinants of acceptance of routine voluntary human immunodeficiency virus testing in an inner-city prenatal population.

Authors:  M K Lindsay; W Adefris; H B Peterson; H Williams; J Johnson; L Klein
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody by using commercially available whole-cell viral lysate, synthetic peptide, and recombinant protein enzyme immunoassay systems.

Authors:  J E Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Heterosexually transmitted human immunodeficiency virus infection among pregnant women in a rural Florida community.

Authors:  T V Ellerbrock; S Lieb; P E Harrington; T J Bush; S A Schoenfisch; M J Oxtoby; J T Howell; M F Rogers; J J Witte
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Placebo-controlled trial to evaluate zidovudine in treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection in asymptomatic patients with hemophilia. NHF-ACTG 036 Study Group.

Authors:  T C Merigan; D A Amato; J Balsley; M Power; W A Price; S Benoit; A Perez-Michael; A Brownstein; A S Kramer; D Brettler
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  11 in total

1.  Screening for HIV during pregnancy. Survey of physicians' practices.

Authors:  S E MacDonald; L A Hartling; R M Seguin; K S O'Connor; M L Rekart; D L Mowat; J R Hoey
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Failure of rapid HIV tests.

Authors:  Eric Wooltorton
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-07-23       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Opt in or opt out: what is optimal for prenatal screening for HIV infection?

Authors:  Sharon Walmsley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees.

Authors:  Kevin Pottie; Christina Greenaway; John Feightner; Vivian Welch; Helena Swinkels; Meb Rashid; Lavanya Narasiah; Laurence J Kirmayer; Erin Ueffing; Noni E MacDonald; Ghayda Hassan; Mary McNally; Kamran Khan; Ralf Buhrmann; Sheila Dunn; Arunmozhi Dominic; Anne E McCarthy; Anita J Gagnon; Cécile Rousseau; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Prenatal HIV testing in Ontario: knowledge, attitudes and practices of prenatal care providers in a province with low testing rates.

Authors:  Dale Guenter; June Carroll; Janusz Kaczorowski; John Sellors
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

6.  Each of the following statements about human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in pregnancy is true.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Prenatal HIV tests. Routine testing or informed choice?

Authors:  Dale Guenter; Janusz Kaczorowski; June Carroll; John Sellors
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Prenatal Screening for HIV in Nova Scotia: Survey of Postpartum Women and Audit of Current Prenatal Screening Practices.

Authors:  Mark Downing; Laura Youden; Beth A Halperin; Heather Scott; Bruce Smith; Scott A Halperin
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Compliance with recommendations for routine HIV screening during pregnancy in Halifax.

Authors:  Stephanie J Côté; Scott A Halperin
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  When pregnant women are not screened for HIV.

Authors:  Alon Shrim; Facundo Garcia-Bournissen; Kellie Murphy; Gideon Koren; Dan Farine
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.