Literature DB >> 9629062

Pushing and pulling in relation to musculoskeletal disorders: a review of risk factors.

M J Hoozemans1, A J van der Beek, M H Frings-Dresen, F J van Dijk, L H van der Woude.   

Abstract

The objective was to review the literature on risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders related to pushing and pulling. The risk factors have been described and evaluated from four perspectives: epidemiology, psychophysics, physiology, and biomechanics. Epidemiological studies have shown, based on cross-sectional data, that pushing and pulling is associated with low back pain. Evidence with respect to complaints of other parts of the musculoskeletal system is lacking. Risk factors have been found to influence the maximum (acceptable) push or pull forces as well as the physiological and mechanical strain on the human body. The risk factors have been divided into: (a) work situation, such as distance, frequency, handle height, and cart weight, (b) actual working method and posture/movement/exerted forces, such as foot distance and velocity, and (c) worker's characteristics, such as body weight. Longitudinal epidemiological studies are needed to relate pushing and pulling to musculoskeletal disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9629062     DOI: 10.1080/001401398186621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  19 in total

Review 1.  Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search.

Authors:  J Bos; P P F M Kuijer; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Pushing and pulling in association with low back and shoulder complaints.

Authors:  M J M Hoozemans; A J van der Beek; M H W Frings-Dresen; L H V van der Woude; F J H van Dijk
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Risk of health complaints and disabilities among Dutch firefighters.

Authors:  Jurriaan Bos; Eric Mol; Bart Visser; Monique Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Low-back biomechanics and static stability during isometric pushing.

Authors:  Kevin R Granata; Bradford C Bennett
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Comparisons of physiological and perceptual responses in healthy men and women during standardized arm cranking and task-specific pushing-pulling.

Authors:  Rammohan V Maikala; Yagesh N Bhambhani
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Interface stability influences torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks.

Authors:  P J Lee; K P Granata
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Examination of postures and frequency of musculoskeletal disorders among manual workers in Calcutta, India.

Authors:  Krishnendu Sarkar; Samrat Dev; Tamal Das; Sabarni Chakrabarty; Somnath Gangopadhyay
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-06-30

8.  Effects of asymmetrical stance and movement on body rotation in pushing.

Authors:  Yun-Ju Lee; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Thomas Waters; Jay Kapellusch; Waldemar Karwowski
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.656

10.  Lower back problems and work-related risks in a South African manganese factory.

Authors:  Bernard van Vuuren; Hendrik J van Heerden; Piet J Becker; Evert Zinzen; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.