Literature DB >> 9629022

Are women who have abortions different from those who do not? A secondary analysis of the 1990 national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles.

G Barrett1, J Peacock, C R Victor.   

Abstract

Studies of women undergoing termination of a pregnancy are often used to make recommendations about family planning and health education policy. However, it is not clear how similar the women in these studies are to the general population of women of childbearing age. Our secondary analysis of the National Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles Survey allowed us to test the hypothesis that women who have undergone an abortion are the same as those who have not (in terms of socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyles, and attitudes). Our findings show significant differences between these two groups of women, particularly regarding ethnicity, marital status, number of natural children, lifetime number of sexual partners, and attitudes to abortion. We conclude that family planning/reproductive health services and health education policies need to take these differences into account and that further research is required to explain why these differences arise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion Seekers; Abortion, Induced; Attitude; Behavior; Developed Countries; England; Europe; Family Planning; Fertility Control, Postconception; Northern Europe; Psychological Factors; Research Report; Sex Behavior; United Kingdom

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9629022     DOI: 10.1016/s0033-3506(98)00221-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  7 in total

1.  An exploration of the dimensions of pregnancy intentions among women choosing to terminate pregnancy or to initiate prenatal care in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Authors:  John S Santelli; Ilene S Speizer; Alexis Avery; Carl Kendall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Clandestine induced abortion: prevalence, incidence and risk factors among women in a Latin American country.

Authors:  Antonio Bernabé-Ortiz; Peter J White; Cesar P Carcamo; James P Hughes; Marco A Gonzales; Patricia J Garcia; Geoff P Garnett; King K Holmes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Women's life cycle and abortion decision in unintended pregnancies.

Authors:  S Sihvo; N Bajos; B Ducot; M Kaminski
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Socioeconomic inequalities in unintended pregnancy and abortion decision.

Authors:  Laia Font-Ribera; Glòria Pérez; Joaquín Salvador; Carme Borrell
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Lifetime induced abortion: a comparison between women living and not living with HIV.

Authors:  Flávia Bulegon Pilecco; Luciana Barcellos Teixeira; Alvaro Vigo; Michael E Dewey; Daniela Riva Knauth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Bayesian spatial analysis of socio-demographic factors influencing pregnancy termination and its residual geographic variation among ever-married women of reproductive age in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Rifat Zahan; Cindy Xin Feng
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Multilevel analysis of factors associated with pregnancy termination in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Getahun Dejene Yemane; Birhanu Bedada Korsa; Sebwedin Surur Jemal
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-07-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.