Literature DB >> 12883066

Women's life cycle and abortion decision in unintended pregnancies.

S Sihvo1, N Bajos, B Ducot, M Kaminski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of sociodemographic, financial, and reproductive factors and of characteristics related to intimate relationships on the decisions of women in different age groups about whether or not to continue an unintended pregnancy.
DESIGN: Cross sectional population based survey.
SETTING: Telephone interview survey between September 2000 and January 2001 in France. From a representative sample (n=14704) of 18 to 44 year old women, those who in the past five years had an abortion or whose last pregnancy was unintended were oversampled (sampling fraction=100%, n=1034) while the other women were randomly selected (sampling fraction =19%, n=1829). Altogether, 2863 women answered the questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: All women whose last pregnancy was unintended and ended in induced abortion or birth (n=645). MAIN
RESULTS: Factors associated with the abortion decision varied strongly according to age. Younger women's abortion decisions were mainly related to being a student and being single. Wanting to stop childbearing when the desired number of children was achieved best explained the decision to have an abortion among 25 to 34 year old women. Older women chose abortion especially when childbearing did not fit their work situation or when the relationship with the partner was unstable. A high level of education of a woman and her partner increased the likelihood of abortion, especially among young women.
CONCLUSIONS: The impact of socioeconomic and relationship factors on the decision to have an abortion is not the same at different stages in life, and refers to the social representations and perceptions of what good conditions are for being a mother.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12883066      PMCID: PMC1732542          DOI: 10.1136/jech.57.8.601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  21 in total

1.  Relying on surveys to understand abortion behavior: some cautionary evidence.

Authors:  R Jagannathan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The influence of significant others on Australian teenagers' decisions about pregnancy resolution.

Authors:  A Evans
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

3.  Legal abortion: a painful necessity.

Authors:  A Kero; U Högberg; L Jacobsson; A Lalos
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Lifecourse and lifestyle: the social and cultural location of health behaviours.

Authors:  K C Backett; C Davison
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Reasons for pregnancy termination, contraceptive habits and contraceptive failure among Swedish women requesting an early pregnancy termination.

Authors:  Margareta Larsson; Gunilla Aneblom; Viveca Odlind; Tanja Tydén
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Evaluation of stated motives for legal abortion.

Authors:  M Törnbom; E Ingelhammar; H Lilja; A Möller; B Svanberg
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.949

7.  Underreporting of abortion in surveys of U.S. women: 1976 to 1988.

Authors:  E F Jones; J D Forrest
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1992-02

8.  Why do women have abortions?

Authors:  A Torres; J D Forrest
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug

9.  When pregnant--why induced abortion?

Authors:  F E Skjeldestad
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1994-03

10.  Induced abortion. Effects of marital status, age and parity on choice of pregnancy termination.

Authors:  F E Skjeldestad; J K Borgan; A K Daltveit; E H Nymoen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.636

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities.

Authors:  David C Reardon
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  An exploration of the dimensions of pregnancy intentions among women choosing to terminate pregnancy or to initiate prenatal care in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Authors:  John S Santelli; Ilene S Speizer; Alexis Avery; Carl Kendall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Male experiences of unintended pregnancy: characteristics and prevalence.

Authors:  Anna Kågesten; Nathalie Bajos; Aline Bohet; Caroline Moreau
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Reducing alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk in college women: initial outcomes of a clinical trial of a motivational intervention.

Authors:  Karen S Ingersoll; Sherry Dyche Ceperich; Mary D Nettleman; Kimberly Karanda; Sally Brocksen; Betty Anne Johnson
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2005-10

5.  Motivational interviewing + feedback intervention to reduce alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk among college binge drinkers: determinants and patterns of response.

Authors:  Sherry Dyche Ceperich; Karen S Ingersoll
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-02-12

6.  Socioeconomic inequalities in unintended pregnancy and abortion decision.

Authors:  Laia Font-Ribera; Glòria Pérez; Joaquín Salvador; Carme Borrell
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  Factors associated with condom use among male college students in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Lu Long; Ting Yuan; Min Wang; Chuan Xu; Jieyun Yin; Chengliang Xiong; Sheng Wei; Shaofa Nie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of rates of adverse events in adolescent and adult women undergoing medical abortion: population register based study.

Authors:  Maarit Niinimäki; Satu Suhonen; Maarit Mentula; Elina Hemminki; Oskari Heikinheimo; Mika Gissler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-04-19

9.  Decision-making about reproductive choices among individuals at-risk for Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Deborah Thorne; Jennifer Williamson; Wendy Chung; Karen Marder
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.717

10.  The Role of Psychological Adjustment in the Decision-making Process for Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy.

Authors:  Sara Sereno; Isabel Leal; João Maroco
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.