Literature DB >> 9628999

Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: the Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation.

J Müsseler1, G Aschersleben.   

Abstract

When subjects are asked to determine where a fast-moving stimulus enters a window, they typically do not localize the stimulus at the edge, but at some later position within that window (Fröhlich effect). We report five experiments that explored this illusion. An attentional account is tested, assuming that the entrance of the stimulus in the window initiates a focus shift toward it. While this shift is under way, the stimulus moves into the window. Because the first phenomenal (i.e., explicitly reportable) representation of the stimulus will not be available before the end of the focus shift, the stimulus is perceived at some later position. In Experiment 1, we established the Fröhlich effect and showed that it size depends on stimulus parameters such as movement speed and movement direction. In Experiments 2 and 3, we examined the influence of eye movements and tested whether the effect changed when the stimuli were presented within a structural background or when they started from different eccentricities. In Experiments 4 and 5, specific predictions from the attentional model were tested: In Experiment 4 we showed that the processing of the moving stimulus benefits from a preceding peripheral cue indicating the starting position of the subsequent movement, which induces a preliminary focus shift to the position where the moving stimulus would appear. As a consequence the Fröhlich effect was reduced. Using a detection task in Experiment 5, we showed that feature information about the moving stimulus is lost when it falls into the critical interval of the attention shift. In conclusion, the present attentional account shows that selection mechanisms are not exclusively space based; rather, they can establish a spatial representation that is also used for perceptual judgement--that is, selection mechanisms can be space establishing as well.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9628999     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  20 in total

1.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Asynchronous perception of motion and luminance change.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-07

3.  Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: evidence for an attentional interpretation.

Authors:  Ingrid Scharlau; Odmar Neumann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-25

4.  Flexible retinotopy: motion-dependent position coding in the visual cortex.

Authors:  David Whitney; Herbert C Goltz; Christopher G Thomas; Joseph S Gati; Ravi S Menon; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Dirk Jancke; Wolfram Erlhagen; Gregor Schöner; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Visual search for a motion singleton among coherently moving distractors.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Ingrid Scharlau; Kirsten Labudda
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-12-18

7.  Attentional load modulates mislocalization of moving stimuli, but does not eliminate the error.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

8.  Motion misperception caused by feedback connections: a neural model simulating the Fröhlich effect.

Authors:  Elena Carbone; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-28

9.  Experiments on the Fehrer-Raab effect and the 'Weather Station Model' of visual backward masking.

Authors:  Odmar Neumann; Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-05-20

10.  Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.