Literature DB >> 9627413

Effect of same- and different-modality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification.

T A Mondor1, K J Amirault.   

Abstract

A target identification paradigm was used to study cross-modal spatial cuing effects on auditory and visual target identification. Each trial consisted of an auditory or visual spatial cue followed by an auditory or visual target. The cue and target could be either of the same modality (within-modality conditions) or of different modalities (between-modalities conditions). In 3 experiments, a larger cue validity effect was apparent on within-modality trials than on between-modalities trials. In addition, the likelihood of identifying a significant cross-modal cuing effect was observed to depend on the predictability of the cue-target relation. These effects are interpreted as evidence (a) of separate auditory and visual spatial attention mechanisms and (b) that target identification may be influenced by spatial cues of another modality but that this effect is primarily dependent on the engagement of endogenous attentional mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9627413     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Daniel Sanabria; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neuronal modulation of auditory attention by informative and uninformative spatial cues.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Alexandre R Franco; Deborah L Harrington
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Attention to memory: orienting attention to sound object representations.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-20

4.  Which factors are important for crossmodal attentional effect?

Authors:  L L Righi; L E Ribeiro-do-Valle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Endogenous language control in Chinese-English switching: an event-related potentials study.

Authors:  Zhen-Lan Jin; Jin-Xiang Zhang; Ling Li
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.203

6.  Cue-target onset asynchrony modulates interaction between exogenous attention and audiovisual integration.

Authors:  Zhihan Xu; Weiping Yang; Zhenhua Zhou; Yanna Ren
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2020-01-17

7.  Facilitation versus inhibition in non-spatial attribute discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Frank K Hu; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Control mechanisms mediating shifts of attention in auditory and visual space: a spatio-temporal ERP analysis.

Authors:  Jessica J Green; Wolfgang A Teder-Sälejärvi; John J McDonald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Intra- and cross-modal cuing of spatial attention: Time courses and mechanisms.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; Hennis Chi-Hang Tse; Barbara Anne Dosher; Luis A Lesmes; Christian Posner; Wilson Chu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Sustained Auditory Attentional Load Decreases Audiovisual Integration in Older and Younger Adults.

Authors:  Yanna Ren; Yawei Hou; Jiayu Huang; Fanghong Li; Tao Wang; Yanling Ren; Weiping Yang
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.