Literature DB >> 23371745

Which factors are important for crossmodal attentional effect?

L L Righi1, L E Ribeiro-do-Valle.   

Abstract

Some results in the literature suggest that crossmodal attention is very sensitive to the features of the experimental protocol. The current work examined the possible contribution of the asynchrony between the onset of the cue and the target (SOA) and the kind of task performed by the observer to the manifestation of crossmodal attentional effect. In a first experiment, a target (Gabor patch), whose spatial frequency had to be discriminated, was presented 133 or 159 ms after an auditory cue, in a close location on the same side or in a distant location on the opposite side. The crossmodal attentional effect was observed only for the 159 ms SOA. In a second experiment, the SOA was again 133 ms, but the location of the target had to be discriminated, instead of its spatial frequency. A crossmodal attentional effect was observed. The results of these two experiments indicate that crossmodal attentional effect depends on the SOA and the task. It takes longer to develop when the task requires the discrimination of the spatial frequency of the target than the discrimination of its location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23371745     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3389-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  On asymmetries in cross-modal spatial attention orienting.

Authors:  L M Ward; J J McDonald; D Lin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-08

2.  Neural substrates of perceptual enhancement by cross-modal spatial attention.

Authors:  John J McDonald; Wolfgang A Teder-Sälejärvi; Francesco Di Russo; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Splitting focal attention.

Authors:  U Castiello; C Umiltà
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality.

Authors:  Rob H J van der Lubbe; Maarten M Havik; Evelijne M Bekker; Albert Postma
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.

Authors:  B A Castro-Barros; L L Righi; G Grechi; L E Ribeiro-do-Valle
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effect of same- and different-modality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification.

Authors:  T A Mondor; K J Amirault
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing.

Authors:  U Castiello; C Umiltà
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-04

9.  Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  L M Ward
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1994-06

10.  How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention?

Authors:  Veronica Mazza; Massimo Turatto; Martina Rossi; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.