Literature DB >> 21264703

Facilitation versus inhibition in non-spatial attribute discrimination tasks.

Frank K Hu1, Arthur G Samuel.   

Abstract

Inhibition of Return is a delay in initiating attentional shifts to previously inspected locations. It has been explained as a mechanism to facilitate visual search of a scene by inhibiting the allocation of attention to locations that have already been examined. We (Hu, Samuel, & Chan, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2010) recently demonstrated that similar processing costs can appear when a non-spatial attribute (color or shape) repeats-detection of a target stimulus was slower if the target shared color or shape with a recently presented cue. In the current study, we test whether such inhibitory effects occur for non-spatial attribute repetition when observers must make a discrimination judgment about targets. We found two independent effects: First, there was a standard location-based IOR effect-target discrimination was slower when the target appeared in the same location as a preceding cue. Second, reaction times were faster if the target's color or shape matched the cue's color or shape; this facilitation effect contrasts with both the location-based inhibition that was present in the current experiments, and with the inhibitory effect of feature repetition in our previous detection task study. The data are best accounted for by a three-factor model recently suggested by Lupiáñez (Attention and time, 2010).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264703      PMCID: PMC3064739          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0061-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  36 in total

1.  Inhibition of return for the length of a line?

Authors:  Lori Francis; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-11

2.  Location and shape in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Lucia Riggio; Ilaria Patteri; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-21

3.  Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention.

Authors:  Chunming Luo; Juan Lupiáñez; María Jesús Funes; Xiaolan Fu
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 4.  Searching for inhibition of return in visual search: a review.

Authors:  Zhiguo Wang; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Effect of same- and different-modality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification.

Authors:  T A Mondor; K J Amirault
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

7.  Attending to color and shape: the special role of location in selective visual processing.

Authors:  Y Tsal; N Lavie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-07

8.  Location dominance in attending to color and shape.

Authors:  Y Tsal; N Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Eliminating inhibition of return by changing salient nonspatial attributes in a complex environment.

Authors:  Frank K Hu; Arthur G Samuel; Agnes S Chan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Multiple cueing dissociates location- and feature-based repetition effects.

Authors:  Kesong Hu; Junya Zhan; Bingzhao Li; Shuchang He; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Eliminating inhibition of return by changing salient nonspatial attributes in a complex environment.

Authors:  Frank K Hu; Arthur G Samuel; Agnes S Chan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-02

3.  Inhibition of return is no hallmark of exogenous capture by unconscious cues.

Authors:  Isabella Fuchs; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.