PURPOSE: To determine if there is an increased prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy in elderly blacks compared with whites, analogous to the difference in incidence of multiple myeloma reported for the two racial groups and to confirm age and gender relationships. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects were from the Duke Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly, selected on the basis of stratified random household sampling. Blacks were oversampled to allow for increased statistical precision in racial comparisons. In all, 1,732 subjects (aged > 70 years) consented to blood drawing and constitute the sample for this study. Monoclonal immunoglobulins were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis and immunofixation. RESULTS: One hundred six subjects (6.1%) had a monoclonal gammopathy. There was a greater than twofold difference in prevalence between blacks (8.4%) and whites (3.8%) (P < 0.001); monoclonal gammopathy prevalence increased with age, and was greater in men than women. Those with monoclonal gammopathy did not differ from those without in socioeconomic status, urban/rural residence, or education. The presence of monoclonal gammopathy was not associated with any specific diseases nor with impaired functional status. There was a slight increase in serum creatinine levels and decrease in hemoglobin and albumin levels in patients with monoclonal gammopathy, but no difference in interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. Moreover, IL-6 levels were not correlated significantly with the level of monoclonal protein. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy is significantly greater among blacks than whites in a community-based sample, in approximately the same ratio that multiple myeloma has been reported in the two groups. Given the absence of correlation with environmental factors, there may be a biological racial difference in susceptibility to an early event in the carcinogenic process leading to multiple myeloma.
PURPOSE: To determine if there is an increased prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy in elderly blacks compared with whites, analogous to the difference in incidence of multiple myeloma reported for the two racial groups and to confirm age and gender relationships. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects were from the Duke Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly, selected on the basis of stratified random household sampling. Blacks were oversampled to allow for increased statistical precision in racial comparisons. In all, 1,732 subjects (aged > 70 years) consented to blood drawing and constitute the sample for this study. Monoclonal immunoglobulins were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis and immunofixation. RESULTS: One hundred six subjects (6.1%) had a monoclonal gammopathy. There was a greater than twofold difference in prevalence between blacks (8.4%) and whites (3.8%) (P < 0.001); monoclonal gammopathy prevalence increased with age, and was greater in men than women. Those with monoclonal gammopathy did not differ from those without in socioeconomic status, urban/rural residence, or education. The presence of monoclonal gammopathy was not associated with any specific diseases nor with impaired functional status. There was a slight increase in serum creatinine levels and decrease in hemoglobin and albumin levels in patients with monoclonal gammopathy, but no difference in interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. Moreover, IL-6 levels were not correlated significantly with the level of monoclonal protein. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy is significantly greater among blacks than whites in a community-based sample, in approximately the same ratio that multiple myeloma has been reported in the two groups. Given the absence of correlation with environmental factors, there may be a biological racial difference in susceptibility to an early event in the carcinogenic process leading to multiple myeloma.
Authors: D Baris; L M Brown; D T Silverman; R Hayes; R N Hoover; G M Swanson; M Dosemeci; A G Schwartz; J M Liff; J B Schoenberg; L M Pottern; J Lubin; R S Greenberg; J F Fraumeni Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ola Landgren; Gloria Gridley; Ingemar Turesson; Neil E Caporaso; Lynn R Goldin; Dalsu Baris; Thomas R Fears; Robert N Hoover; Martha S Linet Journal: Blood Date: 2005-10-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Mary L McMaster; Lynn R Goldin; Yan Bai; Monica Ter-Minassian; Stefan Boehringer; Therese R Giambarresi; Linda G Vasquez; Margaret A Tucker Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2006-08-31 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: O Landgren; B I Graubard; J A Katzmann; R A Kyle; I Ahmadizadeh; R Clark; S K Kumar; A Dispenzieri; A J Greenberg; T M Therneau; L J Melton; N Caporaso; N Korde; M Roschewski; R Costello; G M McQuillan; S V Rajkumar Journal: Leukemia Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Celine M Vachon; Robert A Kyle; Terry M Therneau; Barbara J Foreman; Dirk R Larson; Colin L Colby; Tara K Phelps; Angela Dispenzieri; Shaji K Kumar; Jerry A Katzmann; S Vincent Rajkumar Journal: Blood Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 22.113