Literature DB >> 9624441

dmax for stereopsis and motion in random dot displays.

A Glennerster1.   

Abstract

The upper displacement limit for motion was compared with the upper disparity limit for stereopsis using two-frame random dot kinematograms or briefly presented stereograms. dmax (the disparity/displacement at which subjects make 20% errors in a forced-choice paradigm) was found to be very similar for motion and stereo at all dot densities, and to fall with increasing dot density (0.006% or two dots to 50%) according to a power law (exponent -0.2). If dmax is limited by the spacing of false targets, this pattern of results suggests that the spatial primitives in the input to the correspondence process may be derived from multiple spatial scales. A model using MIRAGE centroids provides a good fit to the data.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9624441     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00213-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  The stimulus integration area for horizontal vergence.

Authors:  Robert S Allison; Ian P Howard; Xueping Fang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The psychophysics of stereopsis can be explained without invoking independent ON and OFF channels.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Variation of stereothreshold with random-dot stereogram density.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Transfer of perceptual learning of depth discrimination between local and global stereograms.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Disparity-tuned population responses from human visual cortex.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Suzanne P McKee; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read; William Herbert; Nicola Goodship; Maeve Woodhouse; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Neural architectures for stereo vision.

Authors:  Andrew J Parker; Jackson E T Smith; Kristine Krug
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.