Literature DB >> 9623263

[Prospective comparison of 2 multi-focal lens models].

A Liekfeld1, T Walkow, N Anders, D T Pham, J Wollensak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The functional results of two different types of multifocal intraocular lenses (based on the diffractive and refractive principle, respectively) were investigated prospectively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Altogether 50 patients who had a multifocal lens implanted were examined 4-6 weeks postoperatively. Visual acuity for distance and near vision, contrast sensitivity, low contrast visual acuity and glare visual acuity were investigated.
RESULTS: Distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, low contrast visual acuity and glare visual acuity did not show significantly different results. Near visual acuity was statistically significantly better with the diffractive type of multifocal lens (because of a stronger adjustment for near vision). When the focus depth was tested by defocus curves, both lenses had better results within different areas of defocus.
CONCLUSIONS: All patients in both groups showed satisfactory results. When choosing a multifocal intraocular lens, the individual needs of each patient should be taken into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9623263     DOI: 10.1007/s003470050271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  9 in total

1.  [Microincision intraocular lens with plate haptic design. Evaluation of rotational stability and centering of a microincision intraocular lens with plate haptic design in 12-19 months of follow-up].

Authors:  W Wehner
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Bioptics with multifocal lenses and Lasek].

Authors:  A Liekfeld; L Friederici; P Rieck
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Functional results with two multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL). Array SA40 versus Acri.Twin].

Authors:  U Mester; P Dillinger; N Anterist; H Kaymak
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses. Investigation of the Array SA40N vs. Acri. Twin at the "physical eye" according to Reiner and Jacobi].

Authors:  F K Jacobi; W Kessler; S Held
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [Functional results with two multifocal intraocular lenses with different near addition].

Authors:  U Mester; B Junker; H Kaymak
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  [First results with a new aberration correcting bifocal intraocular lens].

Authors:  H Kaymak; U Mester
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Contrast sensitivity with bifocal intraocular lenses is halved, as measured with the Freiburg Vision Test (FrACT), yet patients are happy.

Authors:  Alexandra Anton; Daniel Böhringer; Michael Bach; Thomas Reinhard; Florian Birnbaum
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.

Authors:  Samantha R de Silva; Jennifer R Evans; Varo Kirthi; Mohammed Ziaei; Martin Leyland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-12

9.  [A new toric diffractive multifocal lens for refractive surgery].

Authors:  A Liekfeld; N Torun; L Friederici
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.059

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.